The Hidden Toll: When Poverty Undermines Mental Health

By Deborah LeonczykGuest Column
Print Story | Email Story
 
When we talk about mental health, we often think of therapy, medication, or access to counselors. But just as important, especially in communities like ours, are the everyday stressors that slowly chip away at a person's ability to cope: constant worry over heating bills, empty cupboards, children without winter clothing, and the shame of having to ask for help again.
 
These challenges create more than financial strain, they take a serious toll on emotional well-being.
 
For thousands of Berkshire County residents, programs like the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) provide a fragile line of defense against these pressures. Their proposed elimination in the federal budget would remove critical supports, not just from household budgets, but from the emotional stability of families, seniors, and individuals already stretched to the edge.
 
Mental health is not shaped in a vacuum. It is built, or broken, by our environment. When basic needs go unmet, emotional health unravels. That unraveling is one of the most damaging and least visible consequences of poverty.
 
BCAC serves thousands of Berkshire County residents each year. While we do not provide clinical mental health services, we see every day how anxiety, depression, and despair creep in when people are overwhelmed by economic insecurity. When a parent cannot afford to heat their home or buy their child a pair of winter boots, it does not just create physical discomfort, it creates guilt, shame, and a sense of failure.
 
We hear it in the voices of those who call us: the senior quietly admitting they have been living in a cold home, the single mother crying in frustration over a shutoff notice, the middle-aged man, recently laid off, unable to afford groceries and too embarrassed to ask for help. These are not isolated cases. These are daily realities.
 
When CSBG and LIHEAP are in place, we can offer more than a temporary fix, we can offer hope. A warm home in January. A coat that fits. A volunteer who helps someone file their taxes and walks them through the refund they did not know they qualified for. These small things restore dignity and peace of mind. They help buffer the emotional cost of poverty.
 
The CDC's Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) research has shown that chronic stress during childhood, such as housing instability, hunger, or a lack of basic resources, can lead to long-term mental and physical health issues, including depression, anxiety, substance use, and heart disease. When children grow up in homes constantly in crisis, the effects follow them into adulthood. Eliminating programs that prevent or interrupt that cycle puts an entire generation at risk.
 
Now imagine that safety net disappearing.
 
Without LIHEAP, more than 8,000 Berkshire households could lose help with winter heating. Imagine the stress of facing subzero temperatures with no heat and no options. For older adults, that stress is not only dangerous, it is deeply isolating. Prolonged cold and social isolation are linked to depression, cognitive decline, and worsened health.
 
Without CSBG, there will be no funding to respond to the everyday emergencies that quietly destabilize lives, like a missed rent payment or the lack of transportation to get to work. Programs that provide warm clothing to approximately 2,300 children would disappear. Our ability to offer low-income lending programs that help people purchase a car to get to a job, or basic furniture when moving from a shelter into permanent housing, would be lost. The VITA program, which helps low-income families access the tax credits they have earned, would be left unfunded. 
 
These are not luxuries. They are the front line of crisis prevention.
 
As these supports vanish, the psychological effects ripple outward: rising anxiety in households already on edge, depression among those falling behind, and more children experiencing chronic stress in unstable homes. This is how the emotional cost of poverty shows up, quietly, cumulatively, and powerfully.
 
This is how mental health degrades in a community. Not all at once, but one lost resource at a time.
 
And what happens when emotional distress deepens and there is nowhere to turn? For too many, it ends in the emergency room, or in harmful coping strategies. For others, it festers silently, doing long-term harm to children, parents, and elders alike.
 
We cannot afford to ignore the emotional cost of poverty. Experts agree that social determinants, such as safe housing, adequate heat, food security, and economic stability, are directly tied to emotional well-being. If these are taken away, no amount of therapy can fill the void.
 
Here in the Berkshires, CSBG brings in over $400,000 annually. It is not a large sum in government terms, but its impact is profound. It allows us to act swiftly when someone is in crisis, to prevent their stress from becoming trauma, and to protect our neighbors from slipping through the cracks.
 
I urge our community to speak out before this safety net is torn away. Call or write your federal representatives, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Ed Markey, and Congressman Richard Neal.
 
Tell them what these programs mean to you, your family, or someone you care about. Remind them that behind every statistic is a person carrying more than just financial burdens, they are carrying emotional ones, too.
 
Because mental health matters, and with the right supports in place, our children and families can live with dignity, find stability, and build stronger, healthier futures for generations to come.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

Tags: BCAC,   LIHEAP,   mental health,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories