image description
The Parks Commission this week voted to demolish the Wahconah grandstand this year rather than have 'a rusting hulk of a building' sitting on the site until a new one can be built.

Wahconah Park Grandstand Staged for Demolition

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — After a quarter century of hosting baseball fans, demolition is planned for the Wahconah Park grandstand to make way for the ballpark's future. 

On Tuesday, the Parks Commission voted to demolish the historic, disrepaired grandstand and have the project team consider how to retain the electrical elements so that baseball can continue to be played. 

Commissioner Anthony DeMartino successfully motioned to "approve the process of removing the grandstand so we can have the project move forward and with the recommendation of the [owner's project manager] and the contractors about what we need to put in place to allow baseball to happen before we actually have anything." 

The removal is expected to cost $875,000, and the city would like it done in the fall, long before the 2026 baseball season. 

"This is a proposal for your consideration of sort of jump-starting the Wahconah Park project, again, not understanding what the full roadmap is, but knowing that removal of the grandstand is inevitably something that is going to need to be entertained," Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath said. 

"And is this the right time to do that? That's a question for this commission." 

Last year, the Wahconah Park Restoration Committee recommended a $28.4 million rebuild of the grandstand and parking lot, and the Parks Commission supported a move toward the project's design development phase. 

While the 1950 grandstand is not structurally sound enough for use, the ballfield continues to host games with temporary bleachers. Components of the grandstand, such as the replica owls (used to deter birds) and bleacher seats, will likely be salvaged for historical or fundraising purposes. 

"We now are in the reality of having a, for lack of a better term, a rusting hulk of a building that can't be used that will need to be removed if there is a new grandstand constructed, or if there is — whatever gets constructed in its place," McGrath explained. 

"Even if we were just to have a bleacher system, we need to remove the existing grandstand in order to make way for a new project." 

As a part of the project's first phase, planners are looking into razing the grandstand, which must be done in accordance with the state's laws for hazardous materials. The dugouts would remain. 

The city has a full assessment of the "lot" of hazardous material, including asbestos and PCB caulking. 

"There's all kinds of other stuff that would need to be handled in an appropriate way for Massachusetts code, so we understand what those components are," McGrath said. 

He reported, "We have the money in place to remove the grandstand," including federal and city funds. When the project was advanced last year, it had $18 million committed between grant funding and capital borrowing. 



There has been significant demand for the field this year, and there is a potential partnership with Berkshire Community College. McGrath said everything they are doing is to preserve baseball play. 

"We met with Berkshire Community College that is starting a collegiate baseball team. They have expressed interest in playing down at the field," he said. 

"So Wahconah Park continues to be top of mind for a lot of baseball people, and by removing the building, that will just sort of give us a jump start, clear the site, if you will, and get us prepared for the next iteration of the vision for the park." 

Planners propose removing the site's electrical elements and staging them in a small building.  A fence or netting is also recommended for the crowd to stand behind.

Wooden piles underneath the grandstand maintained their integrity. 

"Those piles are as sound today as the day that they were put in in the 1950s, so we would preserve the piles," McGrath explained. 

"Of course, we would not have restrooms. We would make accommodations for portable toilets down there until the point where we have something that is rising in its place, a new grandstand or some other— whatever it is." 

The recommendation will go to Skanska, the owner's project manager, and S3 Design so they can work on a demolition package and bring it back to the commission. 

Commissioners also motioned to recommend that the Conservation Commission look into refurbishing the shed at Kirvin Park. 

"I know this is a little issue. I just think sometimes the little issues show that the city cares about our infrastructure, and it's been looking like that for years," Chair Paula Albro said. 

McGrath reported that the ConCom's chair "doesn't disagree that something needs to happen." 

"I think it's just a matter of getting the right people from the building maintenance department down there, and perhaps public services to look at what could be done," he said. 

 


Tags: demolition,   parks commission,   Wahconah Park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories