image description
Parks manager James McGrath leads a site visit at Pontoosuc Lake Park on Tuesday. The renovation of the south side of the park is 90 percent complete.
image description
image description
The boardwalk runs along the shore.
image description

Parks Commission Hears Complaints Over Pontoosuc Park Shore Access

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The site visit preceded a meeting of the Parks Commission 
PITTSFIELD, Mass.— A site visit to the south side of Pontoosuc Lake Park on Tuesday turned combative at times as attendees passionately voiced their discontent on renovation work they say limits access to the water.
 
The city planted 1,088 shrubs along the shoreline — service berry, buttonbush, silky dogwood, and nine other species. Some of the two dozen people who attended the site visit complained that the plantings are obstacles to using the shore for swimming, boating and fishing. 
 
"We gotta remember this lake is used by everybody that belongs to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts," said Daniel Miraglia. "The biggest area we've had for the public to use. We're taking that away. We're losing our land for open space at an incredible rate."
 
The plantings are part of the redesign and revitalization of the park, a project that was years in planning and is now about 90 percent complete. 
 
The site visit occurred before Tuesday's Parks Commission meeting, and although there were fewer attendees at the meeting, the same concerns were voiced. And the commissioners listened. 
 
They voted to recommend to the Conservation Commission that it consider modifying the current vegetation plan to create additional public access points to the water.
 
The project consisted of 2,268 pieces of vegetation, including river birch, ferns, herbaceous perennials, and the shrubs. 
 
The extensive plantings were an attempt to correct the severe erosion issues along the bank, said James McGrath, parks, open space, and natural resource program manager. 
 
The shrubs typically grow about 6 feet tall, which commissioners agreed would restrict easy access to the water. 
 
Miraglia highlighted how a survey from 2021 showed that 81 percent of respondents said they wanted to use the lakes for walking the shoreline, fishing, kayaking, boating, and other recreation. 
 
He thought there should be a pathway similar to how the Ashuwillticook Rail Trail runs along Cheshire Reservoir, with openings to access the water. 
 
Residents shared fond memories of using the lake, including cookouts, swimming, and boating. But they complained that the lack of maintenance had turned the once vibrant area into wetlands. 
 
“I go down there to see what was happening about a month and a half ago, I honestly shed a tear walking down those stairs to see this, I'm sorry, stupid boardwalk that in five to six years, is going to be full of splinters, and you're going to have to replace the pressure treated,” one resident said, referring to the boardwalk recently installed along the shore. 
 
McGrath explained that Phase 1 on the project focused around increasing accessibility of the park. 
 
"We've connected the upper parking lot on Hancock Road with the lower parking lot via a handicap accessible pathway. All new picnic tables have been sited throughout the park. There is new benches, park benches that have been sited throughout the park," he said. "There's new handicap parking spaces near the restroom, and a new 10-foot wide promenade walkway along the shoreline, which transitions onto a wooden boardwalk and terminates at the edge of the water. "
 
Pontoosuc Lake Park was acquired by the city in 1913 and had not received substantial improvements since the 1960s. Historic pictures of the park show beach facilities, ferry boats, and large slides.
 
Today, it is often used by boaters and fishermen, who use the shore to gain access to the water. However, the shrubs and recent renovations restrict this type of activity. 
 
In 2018, the city initially planned on restoring the historic beach; However, this idea shifted when it was discovered the area was a wetland. 
 
The Conservation Commission made it clear that converting the wetland back to a beach was not an option.
 
Residents questioned why since it had been a beach in the past. 
 
“I don't buy that the Conservation Commission or whatever could not find a way to put a beach where there was always a beach," said one resident. "That's my biggest break. It seems water under the bridge at this point, but it is astounding to me."
 
McGrath explained that filling in the wetlands is not a practice that the Conservation Commission would approve.
 
“You can fill wetlands, but then there is a whole replacement that is required so wetlands can be filled. Wetlands can be modified, but it often results in the creation of other wetlands to compensate for the loss," he said. "So, it wasn't our desire to go down that route, so we pursued the project that we have in front of us."
 
The project has had five public hearings leading up to this point.

Tags: lakes, ponds,   parks commission,   Pontoosuc,   public parks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories