image description

Pittsfield Council 'Moves On' from PHS Investigation Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A city councilor is ready to move on from his unfulfilled records request on the Pittsfield High School investigation. 

Last week, the City Council filed a communication that School Committee Chair William Cameron forwarded from state Supervisor of Records Manza Arthur.  Arthur determined that the Pittsfield Public Schools met its burden to withhold public records, and Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren's administrative appeal was closed.  

"I think we need to move forward. I'm willing to move forward, so I hope people will support my motion to file this," Warren said to the five other councilors present. 

The councilor said he has tried to be a watchdog of city finances and pointed to the cost of legal fees. 

"If I appealed, can you imagine the legal fees that would be generated by the School Department? And if you saw what we got for $156,000 with no litigation, you can imagine what it would cost if there's litigation, and the city taxpayers do not deserve that," he added. 

Three administrators and two teachers, past and present, were investigated by Bulkley Richardson and Gelinas LLP at the request of the School Committee for a range of allegations that surfaced or re-surfaced at the end of 2024 after Dean of Students Lavante Wiggins was arrested and charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for allegedly conspiring to traffic large quantities of cocaine in Western Massachusetts.

Executive summaries released in May found allegations of misconduct "unsupported."  

Because the investigation's final report was found to be useful in making employment decisions regarding an employee, Arthur determined that the district met its burden for not releasing it. 

"Accordingly, I will consider this administrative appeal closed," the supervisor of records wrote. 

Warren said he tries not to unnecessarily have a public dispute with another elected body, adding, "I requested these and I followed through the procedure without making a public fanfare of that. You've seen the result in the decision." 


He sees "a lot" that could be appealed and thinks "some of the submissions that the School Department submitted to the state were unintentionally inaccurate."

"The main justification, if you really read that letter closely, was for the purposes of pursuing discipline. Well, that's incorrect," he said. 

"… Two people were investigated who were no longer employees. Clearly, they cannot be investigated for discipline, and no such action was taken. The other thing is, if you look closely at the summary reports, several of those incidents had already been investigated, which is sort of disappointing, because we didn't know that, and so we see that the city spent $156,000 re-looking into what I count as three to four prior investigations by the School Department." 

At the start of the fiscal year, the school district welcomed interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips after Joseph Curtis retired. Warren sees fresh leadership as an opportunity for change, explaining, "When problems arise, people want changes. You want to see that things don't happen again. I see those changes in this situation."

With this, new training materials, and coordination with nonprofit Enough Abuse, he thinks things are moving forward. 

"I think this community needs to move forward," he said. 

Resident Ciara Batory has had similar outcomes while attempting to access the full report.  

In a June communication, she wrote that her requests for documentation related to administrative hiring at PHS and the cost of a publicly funded misconduct investigation were met with an exorbitant charge for labor hours. 

"Yet instead of transparency, the Pittsfield Public Schools appear to be weaponizing the cost of access against the public. This is especially troubling given that the records I'm requesting concern hiring practices and a $155,000 taxpayer-funded investigation — the contents of which remain hidden from the very people who paid for it," she wrote. 

"This is not just a local issue — it is a warning sign. When public officials use price tags to suppress accountability, we no longer have an open government. We have a closed system designed to protect itself at the expense of the truth." 


Tags: investigation,   PHS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories