Pittsfield OKs Flag Ordinance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city has a new flag policy that stays true to its values and mission.

Flags such as the LGBTQ+ Pride, Juneteenth, and the Disability Pride Flag can still fly on municipal flag poles. 

Last week, the City Council established a flag display policy allowing Pittsfield's flag, the United States and commonwealth flags, flags of other nations recognized by the U.S. government, and flags commemorating significant events or causes consistent with the city's values and mission. 

The ordinance states that "Municipal flagpoles are not intended to serve as forums for free expression by the public," and that "All flag displays on municipal flagpoles constitute government speech." It will take effect on August 1. 

"I recognize and agree we absolutely need this policy," Ward 2 Councilor Brittany Noto said, noting "a similar case happened not too long ago in Boston." 

In 2022, the Supreme Judicial Court determined that the city of Boston violated the First Amendment by refusing to allow a religious organization to raise a religious flag and it had to pay out more than $2.1 million, according to the Associated Press

"I think that it's wise to do this, so thank you for doing this," she said to City Solicitor Devon Grierson. 

"The only thing that I wanted to bring to your attention, which we've discussed over email, is that I want to make sure there are checks and balances between the administration and city council when we refer to the ‘City of Pittsfield.’" 

She recommended stipulating that nothing should be construed to require the city to consider or grant any flag requests "from the public" and giving the council specific governance over flags in the ordinance. 

"We live in a very volatile, chaotic climate right now on the national level. We don't know who's going to get elected into office, and we don't know the type of person they're going to be," she said. 

"I want to make sure that it's not just the mayor who's in charge of this. I want to make sure the City Council, which is a body elected by the people, as is the mayor, has a say in these flags that get deemed part of the, I think the language was 'The city's values and mission.' I think that the mayor and the City Council should participate." 

It now stipulates: 

"The City of Pittsfield, by and through the mayor with City Council approval, retains sole discretion over the selection, scheduling, and duration of any flag displays on municipal flagpoles," in Section 20-106 (d) and, 

"Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to require the City to display any particular flag or to consider or grant any requests to display flags from the public" in Section 20-108 (c.)


"I think it needs to be clear to the public that the flagpole is not a place for public expression. I think you did that with a lot of this language. I would just add those three words, ‘from the public,’" Noto said. 

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren agreed that the decision should be reflective of all Pittsfield constituents and not one person’s choice. 

"By voting of the City Council, it shows the community that there's support behind that and not just the whim of some one particular person," he said. 

"So I definitely always think that we are the body of the voters, the mayor is the executive, but we are from different constituencies, so I think obviously the city council should definitely be involved in something like this." 

The ordinance was passed unanimously among the present councilors.  Councilor At Large Alisa Costa, Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn, Councilor at Large Earl Persip III, Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi, and Ward 4 Councilor James Conant were absent.

At the Ordinances and Rules meeting on June 30, Mayor Peter Marchetti explained that the policy was "Basically put forward with the American flag, Massachusetts flag, POW/MIA flag, and any flag that is deemed appropriate." 

"For example, if we were having Pride month in the city of Pittsfield, like we currently have now, and the city was to declare Pride Month, you could fly the Pride flag. On Juneteenth, the city declared Juneteenth Day, we could fly the flag, and so that's what we're aiming to do here," he said. 

Marchetti noted the city’s observance and flag raising for the 35th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act on Thursday.  It was amended to take affect on Aug. 1, 2025. 

The councilor also supported a petition from Noto, Costa, and Warren requesting that the administration provide a "comprehensive," itemized inventory of all vacant properties and storefronts in the downtown.  

The mayor believes they could have this information back by the end of the summer. 

"I'm sure we're all tired of seeing so many vacant properties downtown, specifically. I want to give property owners a chance to explain themselves," Noto said. 

Property owners will be asked: 

  • How long has the property remained vacant?
  • Who owns the property?
  • What development programs, if any, has the property been subject to in the last 10 years, including but not limited to business loan programs, tax incentive programs, grants, and/or public works projects?
  • Is the property currently facing any zoning, permitting, and/or Building Code obstacles?
  • Is the property currently undergoing any renovation or construction? If so, how long has the property been under renovation or construction? 

Warren thinks this petition will enhance public confidence. 

"When we make decisions, it's important that we have data in front of us," Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey said. 

"And I know that this data already exists, but hopefully this will make it easier having it all in one place and having it presented to us, and then we can make better decisions moving forward." 


Tags: flags,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories