Pittsfield Health Board Delays Nicotine Ban

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health isn't ready to adopt a tobacco ban for customers born after a certain date. 

On Wednesday, the board voted to move forward with updates to the city's tobacco regulations without Nicotine Free Generation language stipulating "No retailer or person shall sell or provide a tobacco product to a person born on or after January 1, 2005." Members would like to see what surrounding municipalities do before adopting the ban that could disproportionality affect only Pittsfield businesses.

"I think practically and politically, it's not the right time," board member Jeffrey Leppo said. 

Retailers returned to this meeting to voice concern for the longevity of their businesses if NFG regulations were adopted, and losing sales to neighboring communities that do not have the ban.  

While he believes Pittsfield has the "most stores and the most people that come in from other places to buy these products," board member David Pill said he would like to see more assurance that other communities are following the same path.  

"The points for me that are most, most concerning is the fact that this is their livelihood, and somebody can literally go to the next municipality," Chair Roberta Elliott said. 

"I've always thought that if the state decided to do it and everybody was in the game, it would at least be somehow fair shot for everybody." 

Discussion began earlier this year with a presentation on the Nicotine Free Generation initiative that aims to prevent future generations from becoming addicted to tobacco and nicotine products by restricting sales to those born after a specific date.

Christopher Gian, manager of Zenner's Package and Variety on Tyler Street, said neighbors without vehicles rely on his store for grocery essentials. He estimates that tobacco accounts for between 18 percent and 20 percent of sales. 

"We lost a lot of things like the flavored wraps, cigars. Understandable, but that was a big crash to our income. The menthol cigarette ban, our electric bill has doubled recently. Our gas bill has doubled recently. Our minimum wage has doubled in the last five, six years. Everything's going up and up and up. With these things being taken away, it's just very difficult to do business," 

"… We're very responsible with who we sell to. We card everyone. We have a computer system that checks IDs before they're sold. We have meetings once a month to make sure that they're sold to people 21 and over." 

He asked the board, "How do you tell a 32-year-old, or eventually, a 35-year-old, 40-year-old, that they can't buy cigarettes here in Pittsfield?" and said the ban would close businesses. 

Kayur Shah, owner of Chico's Wine and Spirits on West Housatonic Street, said "slowly and slowly," the store's tobacco numbers are decreasing because of bans. 



"I'm pretty close to New Lebanon [N.Y.], it's like two miles, so I'm losing, actually, the alcohol customers and tobacco customers combined, because they're like, 'I'm just gonna go to buy a Newport in New Lebanon and just buy 30 pack or other stuff there," he said. 

"So if this — it is going to hurt slowly." 

He suggested education in the Pittsfield Public Schools, saying, "we are here to support any way we can." This was well received by the health officials. 

Other concerned store owners said it would have an impact on the resale value of their business and pointed to the residual sales that come from tobacco sales. 

"It's not only 18 percent that's going to necessarily get impacted. There's a lot of residual sales that come into play of someone entering your business due to the fact that they're going to buy a pack of cigarettes," said Brandon Peaslee of Peaslee's Package & Variety on Wilson Street. 

"… It's a piece of the puzzle that makes everything go around, but there's a much larger impact that this will have on businesses that are staples within our community, and a lot of people rely on these businesses within our community, so it definitely will be hard for everyone." 

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi explained that his perspective has evolved after speaking with retailers. 

"I feel like the conversations that they're having right now with us are very respectful. It doesn't seem like it's a back-and-forth, we're the bad person, they're the bad person. It's more like they're willing to work with us, they're willing to ramp up education, they're willing to solve this together, essentially, but they also make it clear that it's their livelihood," he said. 

"So I'm starting to be more understanding of that, and trying to say, 'OK, they're on our team now.' We're working together." 

In 2023, the board updated Pittsfield's tobacco ordinance to clarify the definition of blunt wraps, raise the minimum price requirement for cigars, and adopt state guidance on fines for violations.

The ordinance had last been amended in 2019 before Gov. Charlie Baker signed an Act Modernizing Tobacco Control, which imposed new restrictions on the sale of nicotine vaping, flavored vaping, and tobacco products.

"I worry about the health of our community. Of course, or else I wouldn't be here, but I do worry about the economic impact, because that affects the health of our community as well," board member Sandra Gattasso said.

"So I do worry about that and families that are running businesses for 30, 40, 50 years, and how that's going to impact many people, because they have employees." 


Tags: cigarettes,   tobacco regulations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories