DALTON, Mass. — Voters approved all six articles on the special town meeting warrant on Thursday, including a contentious police budget.
The special town meeting drew 275 voters, a large number of whom shuffled out following the passage of the Police Department's fiscal 2026 spending plan.
The $1,631,083 budget's passage followed debate with an at times rowdy crowd.
Many voters in favor said the department and its officers are an integral part of the community that protects its residents with professionalism and compassion.
"I've lived in Dalton 18 years, and I've loved every minute of it, except for a night that Chief [Deanna] Strout will remember. They are a class act. I love living in this town because it's a safe town. Someone who is very dear to me lives in a town where there is no police that they have to wait 40 minutes for the state police to arrive," Joe Mindlin said.
"I vote for the Police Department to get what they want. They are class acts. They do their job with compassion, with honesty, with dignity, and they protect all of us here in this town, and that's the reason why I love this town, and I want to stay here, and I think we all should do the right thing."
Several voters shared their experiences with the department, saying officers saved their lives.
"Recently, the quick, coordinated efforts of the Dalton dispatchers [Betsy Balardini and Tiaona Winot, Sgt. James R. Duryea Jr., and Officer Anthony Baroli] as well as the Dalton Fire and other teams, undoubtedly saved the lives of two young boys," voter Lyn Clements said.
"The 12-year-olds were trapped up to their waists in quicksand-style mud. Their young friend went for help. As always, Dalton help quickly arrived. Had it not beed for these often overlooked helpers, Dalton would most certainly be grieving."
Clements said officers als saved her life and comforted her husband during the incident.
Joseph Diver, former Select Board member and strong supporter of the budget leading up to the vote, commended Strout and highlighted the process the town underwent during the search for a new chief.
She passed the chief selection test "with flying colors," has two master's degrees in criminal justice and public administration, and is "well respected, not only in Berkshire County, but across the state," he said.
"I believe that we are honored to have her serve our community. We are lucky. We are very lucky. There are two openings in Berkshire County — Great Barrington and Lee. What if we lost our chief to one of those towns," Diver said.
"Think about what she has delivered to this community and voice your opinion very loud for a yes vote on this budget."
He motioned to increase the budget by $14,000 to address an error that left out the line for new equipment, which Strout discussed during Monday's Select Board meeting.
"I would love to support this $14,000, but we all agreed to this budget. The chief included, and at the meeting, if there was a shortfall, she can always apply for additional funding," said Select Board Chair Robert Bishop
"I think we should stick with our original agreement. I don't like breaking my word."
Diver withdrew his motion to amend.
Voters in opposition pointed to the financial constraints facing the town and some of its residents, and said the department's budget has grown "too much" over the last five years.
Lisa Turner said she believed the police budget should be reduced to $1 million, describing it as more than enough. This sentiment resulted in murmurs from the crowd and some laughter.
"This budget was way too high for this town that has no crime," Turner said.
Strout responded to the assertion of no crime with "you're welcome," which resulted in laughter and some applause from the audience.
Following Moderator Anthony Doyle's reminder to the audience that Turner had the floor, she highlighted two lawsuits against the department and questioned the amount of overtime.
"There are many people in Dalton that are living on Social Security, or less than Social Security. And you may all clap and cheer, and you may all think that's funny, but that is why those people are not allowed or are not able to stay in their own homes," she said.
"They cannot afford it, and it's not a laughing matter, and it's not a joke. That's why people in this town are going to move out, because our Police Department is well in control of that budget."
A motion for a secret ballot failed 162-101 and the budget passed by voice vote.
About half the voters left and the remainder approved all the remaining articles following clarification or with little to no discussion.
The only other article that received more discussion was the request for $59,000 to fund professional and technical work, including the possibility of a lawyer and an engineering company, to ensure the compliance of Berkshire Concrete Corp.'s special permit and town orders.
All comments made were in favor of the article. Speakers repeated comments made during previous meeting — their belief that Berkshire Concrete is violating the Wetlands Protection Act and town bylaws and is causing health issues.
The state Department of Environmental Protection determined that the dust is not an air quality health concern but a nuisance, which the town has the regulatory authority to mitigate.
"I believe when the new permit comes up, or the permit comes up for renewal, one of the conditions could be that Berkshire County Concrete incur the costs of technical review of their plans, but at this time, that's not in their current permit," Select Board Vice Chair Dan Esko said.
"So the town does need to budget some money for this upfront, but it certainly could become part of that permit come November when is up for renewal."
Voter Rachel Branch said she did not think it feasible or acceptable to wait until a permit comes up in the fall.
"You've just heard a woman right here telling you she can't sing anymore, she can't breathe, she can't open her windows. How serious does it have to get for you to take this seriously and find the entity that stops them right now," she said.
The moderator then reminded the audience that the article's purpose is to secure funding for professional services not to critisize town boards for perceived inaction.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more