Pittsfield ConCom Denies Southeast Battery Energy Storage Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— After several continuations, the Conservation Commission has denied a battery energy storage system on Williams Street.

The Conservation Commission voted against a Notice of Intent application from Brattle Brook, LLC for the construction of a BESS at 734 Williams Street, which proposed work in the 100' wetland buffer zone.

Abutters have consistently expressed safety and environmental concerns about the project.  At the ConCom's May meeting, Councilor At Large Kathy Amuso pointed to the company's reported track record of no fires and said, "There's going to be one, and we just hope it's not in Pittsfield." 

"I know we're here for the wetlands, but overall, this project is not safe, and it is a wetlands area. It is a residential, commercial area, and if something happens there, we are all going to be affected, the whole city. And you received over 300 signatures against this petition. They were signatures from people throughout the city," said Amuso, who lives on Alfred Drive. 

"…I think we have to listen to everything that people have said, and it's not a ‘Not in my backyard.' It's really, this isn't appropriate for Pittsfield in a residential area." 

The councilor noted that even if she wasn't an abutter, she would be there speaking against it. 

A BESS stores electrical energy during periods of low demand to be used during periods of high demand.  According to the NOI application, the project consists of a "modular arrangement of rechargeable batteries with sophisticated support control systems that regulate the charging and discharging of electricity." 

Chain link fencing and a 12-foot sound wall were proposed to secure the area and prevent sound pollution. 

"These systems provide numerous benefits, including enhancing grid reliability by balancing supply and demand, integrating renewable energy sources into the grid more effectively, and reducing reliance on fossil fuel-based peaking plants," it reads. 

"BESS installations can provide backup power support during outages and generally support the transition to a cleaner, more resilient energy system." 



The last hearing was continued so that the developers, BlueWave, could delineate bordering vegetated wetlands that were identified.  Engineer Jesse O'Donnell reported, "A little over a week ago, our wetland scientists arrived on site to delineate that wetland, and the plans have been updated to reflect that wetland." 

The battery infrastructure and associated stormwater swale were moved 15 to 20 feet to the west to avoid impact on the newly identified wetland. 

"We find that this layout fits the needs of the project and incorporates, implements the feedback requested from the commission," O'Donnell said. 

Kristin Smith of Brookside Drive asked the commission, "How is that to say, in five more years, the wetland is not going to expand even closer to those pads and everything else?" 

"I find it kind of amazing, and hopefully they're taking it into account when they're building out this project that the last time, well, two meetings ago, we met there, there wasn't even a wetland there, and now, all of a sudden, there's a wetland there," she said. 

It was pointed out that the proposed work is close to the protected area, Commissioner Jonathan Lothrop expressing, "You don't have much room for error here."  There were also concerns raised about erosion controls, to which the applicants said are mapped out in detail in the original document that was submitted, and seemingly insufficient spill containment measures. 

"I feel like we do have some level of responsibility to ask you as the applicant to come up with something that if, God forbid, you wouldn't be able to contain it,"  Lothrop said. 



 


Tags: conservation commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories