Pittsfield OKs $226M Budget for FY26

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council passed a $226 million "best that they could" budget for fiscal year 2026

On Tuesday, the unanimous vote was taken quickly after four nights of departmental budget hearings over the last month. The $226,246,942 spending plan is a nearly 4.8 percent increase from the previous year and includes cost savings from the new trash system and smaller school appropriation. 

"There are a lot of positives, and so if the vote goes the same as it did in the committee, this could be a unanimous vote. Some people aren't going to be happy about that, but like I said, it's one of the lowest increases we've had in recent years," Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren said. 

"And I think all of us up here, the mayor and all of us up here, department heads, obviously they had to work with the mayor to come up with a budget, made a significant effort to do the best that they could." 

He said the last two fiscal years' budget increases have been less than the previous administration. The FY24 increase was 8.9 percent, and the FY25 increase was about five percent. 

"We have cut back, and what some of the public doesn't know is that there's been some things that have reduced the budget that they may not see. It's been stated in the budget sessions, but some people in the public who may not have watched those or watched this meeting might not know, for example, that we had a decent savings in the recycling budget," Warren said. 

"You might not see that because when we save money there, if there's increases in salaries in a contract or something else in another department, that money gets taken up. So, to the public, when they look at the budget, they might not see the recycling savings, but we did that, and it looks like we're on a path to save additional monies next year. That was a win-win for the city." 

The Department of Public Services saw a $600,000 reduction in solid waste disposal due to the city’s new system that utilizes 48-gallon toters for waste and recycling. Councilors also approved $2 million in free cash for street improvements, which Warren pointed out doesn’t need to be raised through the tax rate. 



"There was a decrease in what we contributed to the school budget, not because we're giving them less money, but there were some modifications of the amount of money they contributed to city expenses that we pay for them," he added. 

"Once again, that's a cost savings that the public may not see." 

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso thanked city officials and department heads for attending the budget sessions, "Because it makes a difference." 

The only non-unanimous budget votes on Tuesday were for the water and sewer rates, which Warren, Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn, and Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey voted against. 

Their colleagues approved a 7 percent water rate increase and a 6 percent sewer rate increase based on a 4.40 percent Consumer Price Index Factor. The water rate is based on a 2.60 percent Operational Stability Factor, and the sewer rate on a 1.60 percent OSF.

This raises the typical two-bathroom house's bill about $70 annually, from $1,097 per year to $1,168 per year. For the average metered four-member household, it rises less than $50 from about $734 to $781 per year.

The council also approved: 

  • An order to borrow $7,016,000.00 for Enterprise Fund Capital Expenditures for FY26
  • An order to borrow $9,727,000.00 for General Fund Capital Expenditures for FY26
  • An order appropriating $340,350.00 for parking-related expenditures
  • An order amending Order 56 of the series of 2024, appropriating the amount of $526,548.70 for the FY26 Community Preservation Fund Budget
  • An order appropriating the amount of $526,548.70 from the Fiscal Year 2025 Community Preservation Fund Budget
  • An order appropriating the amount of $500,458.00 from the Fiscal Year 2026 Community Preservation Fund Budget

Tags: fiscal 2026,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories