Pittsfield's $226M Budget Mostly Personnel, Expenses, Debt Service

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mayor Peter Marchetti said the $226 million fiscal year 2026 budget is mostly personnel, expenses, and debt services.

The total for city and school personnel is $110.6 million, health insurance is $33 million, the retirement contribution is $18 million, and debt service is $19.8 million. This represents $181.7 million, or 80 percent of the spending plan.

"So as we begin the conversation, we're talking about people, we're talking about benefits, and we're talking about debt service for the most part," he said to the City Council on Wednesday, the first day of hearings for the FY26 budget.

The proposed $226,246,942 budget is a nearly 4.8 percent increase from the previous year. It includes $86,450,361 for the school department, $11,202,345 for the department of public services, and $15,468,750 for the Pittsfield police.

Marchetti has also asked that $2 million in free cash be applied to offset the FY26 tax rate.

The city expects to raise about $118.8 million in property taxes, and the spending plan includes $19.2 million from water and sewer enterprise funds and $81.3 million in state aid ($68.4 million being Chapter 70 funds for schools).

At the beginning of the year, the mayor foresaw a potential 15 percent increase in the city's health insurance but fortunately, it wound up being around eight percent. During the Massachusetts Municipal Association Conference at the end of January, officials were told that the increase for MIIA/ Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts is between 9 percent and 19 percent, with an average of 14.8 percent.

"We later learned that ours was a 10.9 percent increase, but after doing a really deeper dive and analyzing who is on what insurance plan, that increase is really only an 8.2 percent increase at a little over $2.5 million," Marchetti reported.


After years of deliberation, Pittsfield saw a new trash system with Casella Waste Systems in 2024 that uses 48-gallon toters for trash and recycling. The city was spending about $5.2 million on trash per year, and the new contract trims the budget by about $600,000 to $4.6 million.

"What I get to do today is stand here and say I was right," Marchetti said about the trash system approved during his first year in office.

"We pushed hard for a system for a purpose, and we have been able to see a $600,000 savings in our recycling and trash collection."

The mayor also touted the $27.5 million investment in roadwork throughout 2025 and 2026 that is funded by about $4 million in free cash, $3 million in Chapter 90 funds, $5.2 million in city capital, and $15 million in other state funds.

This includes an "aggressive timeline" of resurfacing neighborhood streets, preventative maintenance, a water main and resurfacing on King Street, West Street streetscape work, East Street streetscape work, and the resurfacing of Route 7.

"I did coffee with the mayor this morning at the senior center, and I said, ‘Well, I finally did it,'" Marchetti joked.

"I've heard all about the potholes and how we can't use our roads, and ‘Mayor, what are you gonna do about our potholes?' to ‘Mayor, when are you gonna stop all the construction in the city? Because I can't seem to get from point A to point B.'"

On Wednesday, the City Council preliminarily approved an  $86 million spending plan for the Pittsfield Public Schools. On Thursday, it tackled departmental budgets for the mayor's office, RSVP, the Berkshire Athenaeum, the office of community development, the Pittsfield Municipal Airport, the department of DEI, human resources, the Council on Aging, the city clerk, veterans' services, and the Department of Cultural Development.


Tags: fiscal 2026,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories