image description
There are plans to transform the Berkshire Mall property into more than 400 units of senior housing, ranging from active independents to assisting living and memory care.

With Taxes Paid, Berkshire Mall Owners Plan for Senior Housing

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The majority of the mall will have to be demolished as the 40-year-old big box stores are not suitable because of space and condition. 

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Berkshire Mall owners have paid their town taxes and plan to transform the property into more than 400 units of housing.

JMJ Holdings is entering into the design process for a nine-figure overhaul of the shuttered mall property into 420 to 450 units of senior housing. Town Administrator Gina Dario confirmed that the full fiscal year 2025 tax balance, totaling $293,380, has been paid.

"It's basically an apartment building that's catered towards older populations, people generally in their mid-60s, and the amenities on site really cater to that lifestyle. It's kind of all comprising," Timothy Grogan of the Housing Development Corp. explained, adding that there will also be assisted living, memory care, independent living, and senior affordable housing.

Grogan was hired as a consultant to guide a feasibility study for the property.  He said there haven't been recent conversations with the town "because we're really hashing it out, we want to come to them with a fully thought-out proposal in terms of the amount of supportable units."

"I think it would be a huge boon to Berkshire County, generally, in a way that the mall used to be," he said. "We're really excited about it. We're moving forward with full steam ahead."

The feasibility study determined that there could be up to 600 units, but the project team imagines a more conservative amount between 420 and 450 units.

It is being scoped as a Low Income Housing Tax Credit project, which means that at least 20 percent of the units would need to be reserved for people at/or below 50 percent of the area median income or at least 40 percent of the units would need to made affordable for persons with incomes at/or below 60 percent of the area median income.

Grogan said conversations have been scheduled with the offices of Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll and state Secretary of Housing Ed Augustus.

"Given the political importance of this property and Governor Healey's emphasis on gateway cities, we don't expect that to be such a long lead item. That being said, this is envisioned to be a phased project where we have the assisted living, active adult and independent living kind of in one bucket with affordable housing in another one," he said.

"And in terms of design, square footage and the like, those have to correspond with the design guidelines published by MassHousing and MassDevelopment, so the square footages for those units are actually bigger than what you see in the typical market apartment in the Berkshires for what we're envisioning for that active, adult and independent living. Assisted living is different because they're more like rooms and dormitories than independent apartments."

But, he said, "we're not there yet," adding the team is now entering into the design process. When asked about the price, he did not have a budget but disclosed, "This is a nine-figure project."


The planners would like to aesthetically harken back to the historical use of the property, maintaining "at least a portion" of the original mall, such as the food court or atrium.  

Grogan said the movie theater is in "fantastic" shape compared to the rest of the property because it was renovated in 2013, but the rest has largely been unchanged since the original construction in 1988. He explained that there is "no transferable use" for the big box stores such as Best Buy and Sears, and given their condition, it is not a financially prudent move.

"Given that the mall has been relatively defunct since, I'd say 2018, besides the Target and the cinema, these systems, when they're not being used, it expedites their depreciation," he said.

"The systems and roofs for the large part can't be salvaged, so if I have preliminarily guess, we would like to maintain about 15 percent of the current mall."

(Target owns and operates its own building though it was connected to the mall's food court.)

While housing is the primary concern, the intention is to bring in ancillary retail at a later stage that would cater to the tenancy and benefit the wider community.

It is far too early to be negotiating with specific retailers about that, Grogan noted.

The project has the potential to bring hundreds of new residents to Lanesborough without putting pressure on the school system, and he said it's garnering "a lot of interest."

"You don't see projects like this out in this neck of the woods, but there are also not many properties such as the Berkshire Mall out there, so that's why we think this is uniquely poised to really become a benefit for the town," he said.

"Because when you're thinking about senior housing, the tenants are certainly good consumers, particularly for the Target, but they're not going to really provide that much weight onto the school district or the roads or many of the other services that the town already has. So it's really a net benefit to all parties being able to create a project of this magnitude in terms of bringing consumers to town, we're talking family and friends visiting frequently, but also being able to have bring a substantial amount of traditional tax income to the town through a normal tax rate system."

Grogan said the property is not subject to a normal tax rate system because of the Baker Hill Road District, which he said charges the property six times more taxes than other Lanesborough businesses are subject to. He said a lawsuit was filed against the district.

The road district filed suit against JMJ Holdings in December, for nonpayment of tax bills; JMJ has demanded a jury trial, saying it has no contract with road district and that Baker Hill is acting outside its legal authority.

The road district is an independent municipal district within the town with a governing body that oversees the maintenance of the Route 7 to Route 8 Connector road as a public way. It is charged with ensuring the timely payment of the Berkshire Mall's bond and that the mall meets obligations to the community regardless of ownership.


Tags: Berkshire Mall,   senior housing,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories