Pittsfield School Committee Approves Long-Anticipated Teacher Contract

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee last week formally approved a three-year contract with the United Educators of Pittsfield after more than a year of negotiations.

Under the contract, teachers will make between about $65,000 at Step 1 with a bachelor's degree and about $128,500 at Step 18 with a doctorate in fiscal year 2027. It also reduces the number of half days scheduled for professional development.

The UEP represents classroom teachers, guidance counselors, department heads, and other specialists.

"UEP started looking at what we wanted to present for the contract back in October of 2023," President Jeanne Lemmond said after the vote was made at Reid Middle School on Wednesday.

"We started negotiating with the School Committee in January of 2024, and it's nice to finally have it finalized and completed so that we can move forward and work on other things in our district."

Lemmond has urged the settling of a contract during open microphone portions of School Committee meetings, highlighting the importance of properly supporting the city's educators.

"We looked at trying to get paid parental leave, which was huge. We looked at trying to stay competitive in the county as far as our salary increases. We looked at finalizing some job descriptions that needed to be kind of cleaned up and clear, and also some stipend positions that needed to be worked on," she said on Wednesday.

"And then a lot of it was more on some of the evaluation process. A new evaluation system that we had piloted finally made it into the contract."

She explained that the new evaluation system for staff who have completed two two-year cycles after achieving professional status, which in Massachusetts is gained after completing three consecutive school years in a school district.

"They can create their own project that then is evaluated, and they can use that project to help teach other people in the district for professional development," Lemmond explained.


"It's relevant. For example, it would be like a high school teacher who wants to create a new course. They could use that time to develop that instead of just being evaluated on their general teaching practices. Seeing as though most of the stuff that we do now is already digitized, you can see the growth students are doing, so they can do something that has more meaning to them."

If qualified, educators can choose to be evaluated through the "UEP+7" system that allows them to explore new ideas, strategies, and educational initiatives by working on projects that align with their specific areas of interest, teaching methods, or classroom needs.

"Throughout the project, educators actively gather data, reflect on their findings, and make evidence-based decisions to enhance their teaching and student learning outcomes. This alternative pathway emphasizes professional growth and encourages educators to take ownership of their development," the contract reads.

"Rather than a traditional evaluation, the emphasis is on supporting educators in their journey to become more effective, reflective, and informed practitioners. It provides them with the flexibility to set their own goals, explore new teaching approaches, and contribute to the broader educational community through their research and development efforts. This pathway will offer educators the chance to propose a project focused on their own professional exploration, growth, and development."

The School Committee approved the contract the week before, but after Chair William Cameron consulted with the union's leadership and its Massachusetts Teachers Association field representative, it was determined that a misunderstanding in the vote warranted another approval.

Because of this, the vote was made Wednesday before the first of three interim superintendent interviews began.

"The School Committee amended the document presented for ratification on Wednesday, April 30, through a misunderstanding of what were eleventh-hour changes the union was seeking in the agreement. Those changes affect certain categories of employees which the UEP has represented for some years. The Committee believed that in correcting what it thought was an error in the document it was thereby accommodating the UEP's request. That turns out not to have been the case. Hence the need for a re-vote," Cameron explained via email.

"I am grateful to Jeanne Lemmond, the UEP's president, and to the UEP's membership for understanding how a mistaken interpretation of the pertinent provision in the document could have occurred. I am grateful as well, for their support of our intention to vote promptly on an unamended version of the agreements the parties reached."

He reported receiving administrative assurance that the delay in getting a final agreement ratified will have no adverse effect on the timing of unit members receiving the retroactive pay they are owed for the 2024-2025 contract year.

UEP Settlement Agreement by Brittany Polito


Tags: teacher contract,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories