Dalton Fire District Approves Tentative Budget

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Fire District's Prudential Committee approved an anticipated budget of more than three million during its meeting last week. 
 
The district's projected budget amounts to $3,569,222.44, comprising the budgets for the commissioner, treasurer, Water Department, and Fire and Ambulance services. This is an increase of $44,542.44
 
The Board of Water Commissioners voted to recommend utilizing $375,000 from the funds raised by the ambulance to offset the amount to appropriate. 
 
The district's Board of Water Commissioners and Prudential Committee collaborated during the budgeting process to mitigate increases. 
 
The Fire Departments and Emergency Medical Services' budgets total is forecast at $1,847,512, a decrease of $26,096. 
 
The department initially requested a budget of $2,052,512. However, the board voted last week to remove Articles 22 through 24, which amounted to $205,000 in spending, until its free cash is certified.  
 
Article 22 requested $80,000 to create an apparatus replacement fund. 
 
"We are trying to do a better job of planning ahead, so that we don't need to go out and take out large amounts of money when we need to replace our apparatus," said Charlotte Crane, fire prevention officer and emergency medical technician. 
 
"So that is a fund that we are hoping to be able to establish so that we can build up cash to have available to replace an [apparatus, whether it is an ambulance or firetruck] if need be." 
 
The district has an older fire engine, so they are working to plan ahead and be proactive, Crane said. 
 
Article 23 requested $50,000 to cover the replacement of the department's garage doors because they are more than 25 years old, out of date and not up to modern safety standards.
 
Article 24 requested $75,000 to replace the department's apron, which is the pavement directly in front of the fire station's vehicle bays. 
 
"If you go out there, you probably see that it's like walking on surface of the moon, because we have very heavy duty vehicles that go in and out all the time, and they have worn, [and have] some fairly significant depressions into that asphalt, and so we're just looking to replace that to make it more level and easier to plow and take care of," Crane said. 
 
The district would have a special meeting to transfer funds from free cash to cover these requested items once it gets certified. 
 
The district does not want to raise those funds from taxes, Crane explained. 
 
"[The board has] chosen that if they don't have the funds to offset Articles 22 through 24 then we won't go ahead with that. But if we do have that free cash available, and that passes, then we would hope to do that apron replacement in the coming year," Crane said. 
 
The commissioner and treasurer's budget is requesting $295,810, an increase of $40,216. 
 
The driving force behind this increase is $20,000 to cover the cost of support for the new municipal financial consulting software, which will improve the district's financial tracking and reporting capabilities.
 
"The support is basically an hourly rate, but we're putting that much money in there, not knowing what we're going to need," said James Driscoll, board chair. 
 
The new system is recommended by accountants and set up for municipalities. Using QuickBooks was not meeting the district's needs, Driscoll said. 
 
Also included was $3,000 for Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45, which allows the district to put funds away for future retirees. This is an increase of $1,500 from fiscal year 2025. 
 
"If you don't fund it now, you're gonna be forced to fund it when they retire. The state gives you the ability to put some money aside so you can keep the impact at a minimal level, as opposed [to increasing the budget when individuals retire,]" Driscoll said. 
 
The Water Department's budget is anticipated to be $1,424,900, a 2 percent increase of $29,423 from fiscal year 2025. 
 
The department budgeted $40,000 to fund the replacement for the stockhouse roof, which is over 22 years old. 
 
Additionally, there is a request for $50,000 for the upgrade of its chlorine analyzers. The new analyzers require less maintenance and are give more accurate readings of chlorine levels. 
 
"[The current analyzers] require a ton of maintenance. Almost three times a week you're messing with them, trying to get a decent reading out of them," said Bob Benlien, water department superintendent. 
 
Voters will also decide whether to approve a citizen's petition to increase the number of board members from three to five. 
 
The decision would reduce the risk of Open Meeting Law violations because it would increase the number of members to have a quorum, a resident in favor of the change said previously. 
 
At the end of the meeting, all three of the board members expressed that they were not opposed to this change. However, they emphasized a desire to see more community participation in attending district meetings. 

Tags: fire district,   fiscal 2026,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories