Pittsfield Health Board OKs Same Mosquito Plan

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city's mosquito control plan will remain the same this year. Earlier this month, the Board of Health approved a mosquito control plan for 2025 that mimics the previous years.

"I don't have any changes to our plan," Chris Horton, superintendent of the Berkshire County Mosquito Control Project, told the board.

Between May and October 2024, more than 25,700 mosquitoes were collected. Out of the 188 pools submitted to the Department of Public Health, five pools tested positive for West Nile virus. There were 15 positive instances of West Nile in the county but no human cases, though there were south of Sheffield.

Mosquito presence peaked in early June when there was a "big" spike in Culex mosquitoes, and that was concerning because that is the vector for West Nile virus," Horton explained.

One trap caught more than 350 insects in one night, which is "of concern." The trap site with the highest average was on Garland Avenue off North Street.

"I think it might have been because we had the holdover water from the previous year. Everything was wet. It was a good condition for them to breed in. Those populations dropped off rapidly and stayed low through the remainder of the season," Horton said.

"In the meantime, we're going to all the breeding spots, we're treating where we're finding larvae, we're treating all the catch basins in the city, we're collecting tires, all with the aim of keeping that population low."

For larvae, BCMCP treated more than 5,700 catch basins and 184 acres of wetlands with bacterial products.

The WNV isolations occurred later in the season, in August and September.

"We made a recommendation for adult control one mile around each of them. The board didn't want to do adult control based on mosquito numbers. Our mosquito numbers were very small," Horton said.


"… The number of positives was not above average for the city, so that being said, I was a little bit apprehensive not to go and kill the mosquitoes that were there because if we had a positive, I wanted to do what I could do, which is spray that one-mile radius around that isolation. But I understand that it's the board's decision."

The 2024 plan included new community engagement efforts and a new process for opting out of mosquito control facilitated by the health department. Director of Public Health Andy Cambi reported that the city, working with BCMCP, has "definitely" ramped up community outreach.

Mosquito spraying was discontinued in 2021 and has been a contentious issue, with the City Council taking votes against it and residents polarized — some believing that the spray does more harm than good, and others arguing that it is necessary.

Board member Dr. Jeffrey Leppo asked what the tipping point is for the board, adding, "I think this group for a long time has felt like one death would be too much."

"We have the numbers in from past years when we have sprayed that, we've been able to track a tremendous drop in the numbers of mosquitoes in areas we're trying to stop," he said.

So we have some sense that we're not just willy-nilly spraying, we're very targeted, we've got a special product, and I think we're doing the best we can to try to make sure that we don't experience a bad case or obviously a death."

He feels this plan is a middle ground.

"I don't think it's perfect. We can't stop it completely, but I think doing nothing is also— we're drawing a somewhat arbitrary line, and we're measuring what we're doing, and I think that's a reasonable approach from a board of health perspective," he said.

Horton added that the city is somewhat dependent on Mass DPH, which sets the risk level used as a parameter for spraying.

"I think when that call comes in that we have a positive, we have a pretty good protocol to go through to help us make the decision around, do we or don't we?" Chair Roberta Elliott asked. 

"And you generally always do recommend it."

Horton replied that he recommends spraying if there is a case of disease, not so much for high mosquito counts.


Tags: board of health,   mosquito spraying,   West Nile,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories