BOSTON — A bill proposed by Gov. Maura Healey would bring $5.3 million more in state Chapter 90 road aid to the Berkshires.
Testimony before the Joint Committee on Transportation on Thursday (held in person and virtually) pointed to the need to address deferred maintenance, jobs, infrastructure battered by New England winters and climate change, and communities burdened by increasing costs.
"I know that transportation funding is so, so important. Infrastructure funding is so integral to the economy of the state," said Healey, appearing before the committee. "It's a challenging topic, but we took a look at things and think that this is a way forward that'll result in better outcomes for the entirety of the state."
The bill includes a five-year $1.5 billion authorization to enable effective capital planning that would increase the annual $200 million Chapter 90 aid by $100 million.
More importantly, that extra $100 million would be disbursed based on road mileage alone. The current formula takes into account population and workforce, which rural towns say hampers their ability to maintain their infrastructure.
"This is an important provision as it acknowledges that while population and workforce may be elastic, our road miles are not and the cost of maintaining them increases annually," said Lenox Town Manager Jay Green, who sat on the Chapter 90 Advisory Group with transportation professionals and local leaders. "This dual formula distribution system addresses community equity by assisting municipalities that do not normally rank high using the traditional formula that is a large number of miles but a small population and often a bedroom community.
"These are rural communities with limited ability to generate revenues to augment Chapter 90 funds for their road maintenance."
In Adams, where he had formerly been town administrator, only gets $275,000 a year for its 55 miles of road.
It's estimated 85 percent of municipalities would receive at least a 45 percent increase over their regular apportionment, which has changed much in the last dozen years.
The bill also calls for $200 million for culverts and small bridges, $500 million for the state Department of Transportation's road and bridge lifecycle asset management, and $185 million for MassDOT safety and congestion initiatives.
Becket Town Administrator Katherine A. Warden, representing a community of less than 2,000 with half its 59 miles of road gravel, said her town is facing a significant challenge with deteriorating culverts — 40 of them.
One collapsed culvert attributed to severe weather has reduced a road to one lane.
"The current expenses to address this situation are estimated $137,500 to cover the engineering permitting and reviews," she said. "Additionally, we will require $750,000 to construct a small bridge that aligns with the stream crossing standards. ...
"In total, we are looking at $887,000 to complete one project with an annual budget of $9 million, you can imagine what an undertaking this cost is, and what a challenge it would be to replace another five culverts that are currently also at risk of failure."
She noted there are 25,000 culverts and small branches across the state.
"It's important to note that the proposed funding is desperately needed, particularly given where the many structures that are undersized, addressing these infrastructure challenges is critical for ensuring public safety and environmental protection," Warden said. "On behalf of the small towns across the commonwealth, I urge the committee to support this bill that will provide resources necessary to address these critical infrastructure needs."
Matt Woodson, secretary for administration and finance, said the increase in Chapter 90 is coupled with a plan to dedicate about $765 million to the Commonwealth Transportation fund, to leverage nearly $8 million of new transportation borrowing over the next 10 years.
"It allows us to expand the Chapter 90 program using new borrowing capacity in the Commonwealth Transportation Fund, CTF Fund, with confidence we can afford to cover the increased size of the program without carrying out other priorities in our capital plans," he said. "Second, it will boost vital funding for all 351 cities and towns to the state, across the state, from the largest to the smallest, with big commitment to rural communities we have heard and you know, the scale of the need.
"I will point out that the last time this formula was updated was in 2012 nearly 13 years ago, and the cost to keep maintaining the same infrastructure has gone up significantly since it was last adjusted."
Representatives from the AFL-CIO and Massachusetts Aggregate and Asphalt Pavement Association spoke to the construction jobs it would create.
"Despite the best efforts of our towns and cities over the years and their hard working municipal employees, decades of deferred maintenance and underinvestment have led to decaying bridges and roads that can't measure up to cold New England weather," said AFL-CIO President Chrissy Lynch. "When we support good jobs in our local communities, we also give those same workers economic stability to stay in our local communities.
Linda Dunleavy, representing the Franklin Regional Council of Governments, said her district was the most rural, with 71,000 people over 725 square miles. It's looking at decline of 25 percent by 2050, according to a study.
"We need a strong economy, we need to build jobs and we need to build housing and we need a strong infrastructure, a transportation infrastructure," to blunt that decline, she said.
The average amount of Chapter 90 for each community is $230,000, but it costs $340,000 to pave a mile, Dunleavy continued. "Increasing by $100 million increases the average by 75 percent. .... but it shows you how the $200 million formula disadvantages very rural communities. ...
"Our towns would use the extra money to very carefully plan how to deal with their infrastructure instead of just dealing with emergencies instead or doing the bare minimum."
The committee members, which include state Sen. Paul Mark, plan on making some road trips to take more testimony on the bill.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more