Pittsfield High Investigation Extended One Month

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school district-initiated investigation into alleged misconduct of Pittsfield High School staffers will conclude by the end of April, one month later than expected.

On Wednesday, the School Committee voted to extend the retainer agreement with Bulkley Richardson & Gelinas for investigations of wrongdoing by "certain Pittsfield Public School Employees."

"The investigation is coming to a close, but it may not be finished, and the documents may not be completed by the 31st of March, which was the date for the original retainer," Chair William Cameron said.

"And so, although I do not believe that we will be waiting until April 30 to get these documents based on conversation I had earlier this week with (lead investigator Judge Mary-Lou Rup,) we do, I think, need as a precaution to extend this so that they can complete the work that was contracted for within the time frame that the School Committee has approved."

The state Department of Children and Families has cleared Dean of Students Molly West and Vice Principal Alison Shepard of misconduct claims that surfaced in December.

To accompany the DCF investigation, the Pittsfield Public Schools hired the 100-year-old firm at the end of 2024 based on a recommendation from other attorneys, its tenure, and its experience with institutional investigations of employee wrongdoing. Rup, a retired Superior Court judge, is the lead investigator at a rate of $275 per hour and paralegal services for $110 per hour.  

When later asked to clarify the status of West and Shepard, Cameron, via email, stated those were personnel matters handled by the administration. The School Committee is only involved in the independent investigations of "five current or former Pittsfield Public Schools employees ... because of accusations from certain quarters of administrative nonfeasance in the employment of those individuals," he wrote.

The retainer extension was approved without discussion, but at the beginning of the meeting, former city councilor Karen Kalinowsky reignited conversation about PHS students feeling anxious and unsafe about West returning to work.

"I came here today because after watching the School Committee meeting two weeks ago, I had to speak up," Kalinowsky said, adding that she felt the committee belittled students' concerns.

At the meeting on March 12, PHS senior Emma Goetze said she was "appalled, deeply disappointed, and frustrated that an administrator who has been placed on leave, someone who has caused significant discomfort and distress to so many students, has been allowed to return to our building."



"I understand that there is an investigation and acknowledge that this individual was cleared but it feels incredibly unjust to me and to many of my peers that despite everything, this person is being given the opportunity to come back," she said. 

Kalinowsky said when she was in the schools as a resource officer, a student reported an assault by a teacher, and after a second incident, the staff member was "finally" let go. She suggested that the administrator in question be taken out of PHS "and put her somewhere else, maybe (the Mercer administration building), you've got a lot of people in that building."

"I'm sorry. You need to take care of these students, how you're doing, and how your apathy went up here is horrible. I worked in these schools. I saw what goes on," she said, adding, "and I'm sorry, just because something's unfounded does not mean it didn't happen."

Kalinowsky concluded by asserting that student voices matter, and if they come to you for help, don't just thank them for coming.

Student representative Elizabeth Klepetar, who was unable to attend the last meeting but watched the recording, thinks the School Committee's response was "a little bit disappointing."

"I think it takes a lot of guts for these kids to come up here and speak what they're feeling, especially when it comes to the safety because when you're going somewhere from 7 (a.m.) to 3 (p.m.) or sometimes we have before school activities or after school activities, you don't want to be scared. You don't want to be afraid," she said.

"We shouldn't have that feeling going into school every day. I have that feeling going into school. All of my friends do. And I think that the reason why we're scared is because there's a lack of communication and when the students are coming up here to talk, I think we have to treat them with respect instead of — well, not that you didn't treat them with respect but just understand that that's a very brave thing for them to do and it is kind of a scary time to be going to school."

School Committee member William Garrity apologized for his comments at the last meeting, where he said he understood the students' anxieties and frustrations, but there was no evidence.

"I'm sorry I failed you students. I'm sorry," he said. "I think I could have been stronger, and I wasn't, and I should have. I think we need to listen to you more. We need to figure out a way to make you all feel safe, and I'm sorry that I've shoved your comments away."


Tags: investigation,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories