image description
Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath, left, and Seth Jenkins, senior planner at BRPC, go over the city's Open Space and Recreation Plan at a public meeting in October.

Pittsfield Works to Update Open Space & Recreation Plan

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The city's Open Space and Recreation Plan is due for an update to guide the next five years.

Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Manager James McGrath and Seth Jenkins, senior planner at the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, have worked on the effort over the past year so that the city remains eligible for state grant funding. The last approved plan ran from 2019 to 2024.

"We want to make certain that our strategies are attainable and that we have a clear path of funding to get them implemented," McGrath told the Parks Commission on last week.

"Because there's nothing worse than sort of creating this excitement over something and then not having the resources to implement or not having the funding."

Open space and recreation plans are a tool communities use to plan for conservation and recreation needs and are reviewed by the Division of Conservation Services. Open spaces go beyond city parks, as preserves and land trusts, waterbodies, farms, forests, and more fall under that category.

A survey garnered nearly 300 responses last summer and results were presented during a public forum in October.  At the meeting last year, the most popular words attendees used to describe Pittsfield parks were "clean" and "beautiful" and nearly 60 percent of survey respondents want to see bathroom improvements.

"We heard a lot from folks in terms of satisfaction with the city's parks but also maybe some desires to see," Jenkins said.

"Some bathroom improvements, some security and lighting improvements, maybe some additional programming but for the most part, people sounded like they were happy. So now we're looking at the old plan, the 2017 plan, to say, 'Where are we with these goals that were in that plan? Are some of them maybe no longer necessary? Are some of them requiring an update? Are some of them needing a complete revision?"

The five goals enunciated in the 2017 OSRP and objectives were reviewed with the commission:

  1. Protect natural resources to maintain biodiversity.
  2. Ensure adequate opportunities for recreation and consideration uses for residents of all ages and abilities.
  3. Ensure adequate funding for maintaining and upgrading existing city parks.
  4. Preserve traditional land use patterns, decrease sprawl, and protect open spaces.
  5. Partner with residents, the state, and other groups to enhance open space facilities.

"We're sort of chipping away at all these and trying to understand what makes sense to carry forward," McGrath said.


He explained they are not at the point of revisiting the plan's goals and objectives to see if they need tweaking.  He then wants to use the commission and the public's feedback to craft action items that will help the city meet its goals and bring them back in a month or two.

"I will preface that this goal four and these objectives have been reviewed by our city planner,"  he clarified about the goal related to preserving traditional use patterns and decreasing sprawl.

"And there's a lot of conversation that he's having right now around the current goals for the city around future development, how we should be developing as a community into the future."

Commissioner Anthony DeMartino feels the goals "almost can just kind of keep going on because you wrote them so well."

"It speaks to the land, the maintenance, the financing," he said. "But that is the work each time we review this plan that has to get customized, chipped."

McGrath said the strategies really are "where the rubber meets the road" and the team is working on that now.  Commissioners will review a marked-up draft and provide any comments they see fit.

"And we'll sort of put it all up in a sifter and we'll sort of see what shakes out," he explained.

"And there's really no right or wrong way to do this but it's really just critically important that if there's something we feel really strongly about as a commission, that we make certain that we get it in here."

Chair Paula Albro commented that this is a place where the Wahconah Park restoration should be and was met with "absolutely."

The OSRP will include a wide range of information on the community and residents, environmental resources and challenges, open space and natural lands, recreational facilities, and community goals and needs. It will be used to develop a five-year action plan of specific tasks to be accomplished to meet the community goals related to open space and recreation.

 


Tags: parks & rec,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories