image description

Pittsfield Board Advances Short-Term Rental Ordinance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city has established an accessory dwelling unit ordinance and now, will tackle short-term rentals.

On Tuesday, the Community Development Board supported a zoning amendment that allows short-term rentals and provides operational regulations. It will advance to the City Council with the board as petitioner.

"The fact that we don't have any legislation in the city regarding short-term rentals, it makes it very difficult for the building inspector to act on something that doesn't legally exist," Chair Sheila Irvin explained.

Proposed draft language was continued last month and a working group then ironed out the details.  Changes were made to cap occupancies and allow the local contact to live in wider Berkshire County.

Vice Chair Gary Levante was happy about some of the changes that came out of the working group and thanked members for the extra effort.

"I think this is a good first step and I'm pleased with where we're ending up," he said.

The ordinance has a 12-person occupancy cap that requires 250 square feet of gross floor area per renter, increased from 200 square feet per renter.  City Planner Kevin Rayner said this should lower occupancies "a little bit."

"We can't have 18 people in a house," he said.

"We kind of thought that a family unit would be four people on average so wanted to say three families on a summer vacation or something could have one house but we didn't want to raise it above that."



At the last meeting, several people who live on Onota Lake voiced concern about neighborhoods being taken over by rowdy short-term rentals, citing a Lakeway Drive home reportedly advertising for 16-plus occupants and causing a ruckus.

Neighbor Gary Moynihan reported seeing underage people drinking and groups occupying the property for party weekends.

"Yelling across the lake, making it just very intrusive to the residents who live there and enjoy the property," he said.

The proposed ordinance also requires the short-term rental operator to designate a local contact who lives in Pittsfield or Berkshire County to make decisions regarding the property in place of the owner or operator. Previous language required a local contact in an abutting municipality Rayner noted this is more accessible for people who live in the county who may want to operate a short-term rental.

He pointed out that this is only half of the proposed city regulation, as the other half is code change that details licensing and enforcement. This has to go through the Ordinances and Rules subcommittee before the full council.

"We intend for these two ordinances to go to City Council on the same day so that councilors can talk about both of them and make a decision on both of them at the same time," he said.

The ordinance's purpose is to "Allow residents to earn supplemental income from short-term rental properties while also minimizing the risks to health and safety, provide for the orderly operation of short-term rental properties in residential neighborhoods, and to deter commercial interests from purchasing housing units with the intention of primarily using these units for short-term housing."

A short-term rental is defined as any rental of legal units or bedrooms for less than 30 consecutive days but not at a bed-and-breakfast, hotel, motel, lodging house, or timeshare.  The ordinance also bars the rental to have stays more than 150 days out of a calendar year.


Tags: short-term rentals,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories