Dalton Select Board OKs Concrete Sidewalks for Orchard Road

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board voted to have concrete sidewalks for the Orchard Road reconstruction. 
 
The anticipated start date of the project, according to the town manager, is April 1, Select Board member Marc Strout said on his selectman's Facebook group. 
 
The base bid of $923,807.36 does not include a full sidewalk. The base bid included a small center area to be paved with bituminous asphalt, Town Manager Tom Hutcheson said during the Select Board meeting last week. 
 
To have sidewalks, the board had to accept from the alternates proposed that had additional cost estimates. 
 
The board voted to have the entire sidewalk to be concrete, which would bring the total cost of the project up to approximately $1,051,295.
 
A majority of that will be covered by the $1 million state MassWorks grant that the town was approved for last year. 
 
The remaining approximately $51,000 would have to be covered using the rural road funds that the town receives. 
 
Alternate A would extend the sidewalk using asphalt all the way to Routes 8 and 9 from the center and would have cost an additional $63,850, bringing a total cost of about $987,657.36. 
 
Alternate B was for the outer sections of the two additional stretches of sidewalks to be made of concrete, which has a bit for an additional cost of $44,695. 
 
Alternate C was for the stretch of the sidewalk between Route 9 and Route 8 to be made of concrete for an additional cost of $18,900.
 
Having the whole sidewalk be concrete is anticipated to cost an additional $63,595, combining the base bid with the cost of alternate B and C. That plan would bring the project to $1,051,252.36, the sidewalk option sheet said.
 
"For the additional sidewalk, it was just asphalt around $64,000 is already being covered as part of the grant, plus another $13,000, so I think that's a good deal for a long stretch of concrete sidewalk," Select Board Vice Chair Dan Esko said. 
 
"That's basically, we're paying $51,000 for that entire stretch of concrete sidewalk. And that's, that's good value, I think, for our money but that's my opinion." 
 
According to the project engineer, SK Design Group Inc., existing typography of the area such as trees, poles, and a fire hydrant, is preventing one continuous sidewalk along the stretch of the road. 
 
The sidewalk needs to be constructed on the east side of the road, beginning at Route 9 and extending to Pease Avenue. Then, from the south of Pease Avenue and the river, the sidewalk has to be built on the west side. 
 
"That is the current plan to place it on the other side would be substantially more expensive and would result in a very substantial delay to the project," Hutcheson said. 
 
Resident Amy Musante expressed her concerns with this design which she has raised at several meetings. 
 
She said that it was unsafe for children to have to cross the street twice rather than once. 
 
Musante also emphasized a concern she has raised during numerous meetings — that the construction of a sidewalk along the edge of her farmland could negatively impact the soil health. The farmland is protected under an Agricultural Preservation Restriction.
 
According to a soil analysis by Cornell and UMass, there are already issues with the land's soil health, particularly in the northeast corner, which is not along the sidewalk, caused by runoff from Route 9, she said during a meeting in February. 
 
"Soil scientists have suggested to me that looking at the magnesium levels there, that it's likely the result of runoff from Route 9, so efforts to keep the road from freezing and the salt has is contaminating the soil, and that's going to be a big uphill battle to try to get around that, in my efforts to try to reclaim that field in a more healthy situation than it's been maintained by previous use," Musante said. 
 
If the sidewalk is constructed there the town will have to put salt on it to keep it safe for residents, she said. 
 
"I'm concerned that will further contaminate the field along that that area. And so I think that's a legitimate concern on my part, regardless of what the chemicals that they use," Musante said. 
 
"Not only would that harm the soil ecology, but it also impacts the soil structure, and this leads to the build-up of water and saturated soils, which basically means you're going to get more pooling and more runoff. And that's not something that obviously, anybody wants along Orchard Road there."
 
Background on the Orchard Road Reconstruction: 
 
The road, which is often used as a connector to Route 9, has had flooding for many years because of undersized drainage pipes, Highway Superintendent Edward "Bud" Hall has previously said. 
 
Most of the flooding is in the middle of the road and into abutting residents' yards, sometimes reaching a depth of 6 inches near the Pease Avenue and Appletree Lane intersections to the East Branch of the Housatonic River. 
 
The reconstruction includes a new drainage system that will replace the piping and catch basins with new and bigger pipes and move them to the center of the road from Pease Avenue to the bridge.
 
The blacktop on the other side of the road, near Wahconah Country Club and from the Massachusetts Public Works building to Route 9, will be replaced. 
 
This project has been six years in the making and is now possible thanks to the town's approval for a state MassWorks grant of $1 million. The grant will be used to address the street's drainage issues. More information on the grant is here

Tags: MassWorks grant,   sidewalks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories