image description
Neighbors supplied photo evidence with their petition. Above left, sand on a tarp shown after snowmelt. The petition says the dust is impacting the town's natural neighbors as well with, right, the forest floor being covered in sand.

Dalton Residents Petition for Action on Berkshire Concrete Dust

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — Several hundred residents have petitioned the Planning Board and Board of Health to take action regarding complaints surrounding Berkshire Concrete Corp. 
 
On Wednesday, the Planning Board will be providing an update on the organization's dust mitigation plan and the petrographic test results expected to determine the dust's composition. The meeting will take place at the Senior Center starting at 7 p.m.
 
During an update on the situation at a February Select Board meeting, the Board of Health said it is actively working with the state Department of Environmental Protection on air sampling from the sand dust to understand its contents.
 
In February, the town ordered Berkshire Concrete to stop work because of a "clerical error" that resulted in abutters being improperly notified.
 
Although work has stopped, residents say sand and dust is still blowing into the neighborhood. 

Sand can be seen on the snow in this March 9 photo of Prospect Street supplied by the 'Neighborhood Group of Concerned Citizens.'
A neighborhood petition gathered 357 signatures to urge the boards to take strict action on the situation. 
 
The petition urges the following steps be taken: the town cease approval of all future permits to Berkshire Concrete Corp. parcel 105-16; zone the parcel to protect it from all commercial purposes in perpetuity; and enforce strict reclaiming of the parcel to include but not be limited to regrading steep slopes, mulching mats to protect seed, and reforestation;
 
It also requests that all work at the entire mine site be stopped until corrective action has been taken and approved by governing authorities; that the town enforce permit conditions in a timely manner; and continually monitor air quality at the site and in the neighborhood. 
 
It stipulates that if the corrective actions do not prevent dust from leaving the Berkshire Concrete property line within 24 hours of implementation of the permits then it requests all mining operations be permanently barred for parcels 217-3, 106-55.1, 106-56, 106-63, 105-12, 105-16, and 101-25. 
 
"You have an understanding of the health dangers we have been exposed to. You understand that we have been denied due process of law since 2022 when the special permit was issued for earth removal behind our homes," the petition says. 
 
"We do not want to have to pursue our legal options because of this negligence, but we are prepared to do so if needed."
 
The petition argues using, newspaper clippings dating back to 1976, that Berkshire Concrete has "shown a generational disregard for the citizens of Dalton." 
 
"Why are we still enduring this? We are here now to say enough. This is where it ends. The only mitigation plan we need is their plan to stop the dust permanently and to stop it now. There is no need for another permit with special conditions," the petition says. 
 
"Berkshire Concrete has proven over and over again that they have no intentions of following any conditions and the town has not enforced those conditions anyways. We are here today to present the town with our petition." 
 
More than 50 people attended Monday's Select Board meeting in person and online.
 
The Select Board explained that the situation surrounding the permit is not in its jurisdiction and falls to the Planning Board's purview. 
 
"The Select Board is obviously going to be involved, but ultimately, it's the planning board that governs the special permit, and the zoning enforcement officer enforces that permit," Vice Chair Dan Esko said.
 
The board, however, voted to issue a request that the zoning enforcement officer attend the Planning Board meeting on Wednesday. 
 
"I did meet with representatives of Berkshire Concrete, and I believe they do have a heightened awareness of the problem. They looked at it. They see what's going on even when it's not operating, and they know they have to come up with a strong implementation plan," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
"So I can just say that's the state of my knowledge at this point, but that's what we're waiting for, is the implementation plan. Then we have to see if it's any good, then we have to hold them to it when it's implemented." 
 
During a previous meeting, the Select Board sent a letter to the Planning Board urging it to impose special permit conditions to fully address and mitigate the dust issues caused by Berkshire Concrete's operations. 
 
Select Board member John Boyle will attend the Planning Board meeting on Wednesday to present the letter. 
 
The letter requests that Berkshire Concrete provide a technical plan for dust mitigation that can be reviewed by the town, including hiring an independent air quality monitor.
 
There is a cease-and-desist order currently in place on Berkshire Concrete, but even without active operations, the open areas on the site continue to erode in the wind, spreading substantial material into neighboring properties, say abutters.
 
"There's no remediation attempt at all from one shovel to the next shovel. You do this work. You remediate it so that it's not sitting there open to the winds so that these particles can move throughout the town," resident Ronald Griffin said. 
 
Griffin said he had conversations with engineering firms that emphasized the importance of working and remediating the site properly. 
 
"I think there's a lot of people here who would acknowledge that it has not been touched after they put a shovel to it, not been touched. That, from a town perspective, is borderline irresponsible," he said. 
 
"Lynne and I had conversations with the building inspector about just that, and he raises up his arms and says, not my job. Well, who the hell would we go to to get the answers to that problem? Because I don't think we would have this problem as bad as it is right now if they, in fact, follow some routine to avoid a situation where all of this product is just left wide open, and the wind is accessible to it, and the neighborhoods are getting hit." 
 
That is the kind of comment that the planning board needs to hear to refine its order of conditions to be more specific, Hutcheson said. 
 
"Because I think one of the problems we're dealing with is [the permit is] overly broad, and that is a very specific condition that the planning board could put into an order of conditions that would help."

Tags: BOH,   dust, debris,   Planning Board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories