BRTA Mulls Extending Free Rides to Non-ADA Communities

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority may extend free rides even further for the next few months.

This would expand opportunities for rural residents to use the transit authority's services and could even be a catalyst for route extensions.

On Wednesday, the BRTA Finance Committee recommended the extension of fare-free rides to non-ADA communities for the months of April, May, and June. It will go before the full advisory board at the end of the month.

"It's a way of getting more service out there to communities that maybe don't have it or aren't using it," Administrator Robert Malnati said.

Last year, BRTA was awarded $699,733 from the state for fare-free service from Jan 1, 2025, through Sept. 30, 2025. The funding was provided in Fiscal Year 2025 budget signed by Gov. Maura Healey in July and builds off of two years of successful pilot programs.

BRTA was previously awarded funding to provide free rides for the 2024 holiday season.
 
Malnati explained that the fare-free initiative was for fixed routes and ADA paratransit services. He was approached about offering this opportunity to non-ADA communities that don't have fixed routes, as it could be a way for them to learn more about the BRTA.

"And maybe this would, if funding were available, increase fixed route eventually," he said.

"But at least now, we would have the fare-free for the ADA and non-ADA trips and the non-ADA trips primarily were for the communities that don't have fixed route."

He reported that there are very few same-day non-ADA service requests. This would extend to communities like Richmond, West Stockbridge, Windsor, and Savoy.



"If they were so inclined to try the service, they could," Malnati said.

Transit to Pittsfield for these communities could cost as much as $25 for a round trip. There is about $7,000 in the budget from turned-back Council on Aging vehicles that could offset the cost of extending fare-free trips.

"Theoretically, this is something that the Finance Committee would approve, then it would go before the full board at the end of March and then we would between now and then work on how do we promote this and then start it for the last quarter, April, May and June," Malnati explained.

Douglas McNally said this is a good opportunity to make BRTA "absolutely countywide."

"This would be something where we would be saying that anybody in any community can use the paratransit for free for three months," he said.

"I think this is kind of a fare-free bonus because absent of an opportunity like this, most residents of these towns have no idea what BRTA offers."

Other committee members agreed, coining it as a great opportunity and pointing out "It is the Berkshire Regional Transit Authority after all."

"It's not just the towns that get fixed route," Malnati added.

Last year, BRTA celebrated its 50th anniversary with new hybrid buses that tell a story about its history.  It was awarded five eco-friendly buses as part of former President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law under the Federal Transit Administration's Low or No Grant Program. Each is valued at about $800,000 and is decorated to represent different BRTA eras.


Tags: BRTA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories