image description
The School Committee authorized the personnel/negotiations subcommittee to search for an interim superintendent that starts no later than July 1

Pittsfield Will Seek an Interim School Superintendent

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Joseph Curtis will be replaced by an interim superintendent in June.

On Wednesday, the School Committee authorized the personnel/negotiations subcommittee to search for an interim superintendent that starts no later than July 1-- earlier if possible.

"I wish we were not having to do this," Chair William Cameron said.

A couple of weeks ago, Curtis announced that he would be stepping down at the end of June after 30 years with the Pittsfield Public Schools.  He read an emotional message that explained his decision is "The right decision for me, for the district, and the community I care deeply about."

The outgoing superintendent said in the coming months, his priority will be to ensure a seamless transition to his successor.

Cameron told the committee on Wednesday that they have three options: conduct a full-bore search for a new superintendent, secure an interim superintendent for some or all of the upcoming school year, or do nothing.

Members agreed that filling the position temporarily is the best path forward.

William Garrity pointed out that he and Mayor Peter Marchetti (then council president) were on the search committee that selected Curtis about four years ago.  Garrett was a student representative at the time and remembers being told by the Massachusetts Association of School Committees that most superintendent candidates are looking to apply at the beginning of the year.

"I think we would be at a really strong disadvantage if we started a full-time superintendent search tonight," he said.

"I think we should go the interim route, be able to provide at least some continuity while also allowing us to conduct a more full search. We're also coming up on election season. The School Committee composition may change so that's also another fact we have to consider."



Sara Hathaway agreed.

"I think it's not a secret that we will need to adjust the salary for the position in order to attract top candidates," she said.

"We have had a bargain clearance sale price on that position for a long time. We tried to raise the salary last year and Mr. Curtis declined the raise that was calculated for him so I think we need to look at a number of aspects of the position before we conduct a search for a long-term candidate."

Dominick Sacco said he knows that time is of the essence but "this is such an important position and it is something that we really need to look at very carefully, take our time."

"It's not that we have a lot of time but take the time we have and really look deep into the credentialing and also the priorities that we're looking for," he added.

"Because there are obviously priorities that need to be dealt with I think more immediate than later and that should be talked about."

Cameron said Marchetti, who was absent from the meeting, asked him to share that he believes an interim superintendent is a sound approach.


 


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   superintendent,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories