image description
East Branch Housatonic River in Dalton.

Lee Residents Rally in Boston for Alternative Housatonic River Cleanup Plans

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LEE, Mass. Town Leaders have scheduled a "Save the Housatonic" rally in Boston at Sam Adams Park in front of Faneuil Hall  on Thursday, Feb. 27 at noon.
 
Lee Town Administrator Christopher Brittain hopes this will raise awareness of Housatonic River pollution in the eastern part of the state.
 
"We're trying to get the word about this out to a different audience, to a different media, as well as, again, there's a lot of whether it be political, or EPA [Environmental Protection Agency], or GE [General Electric] they are all in that area," Brittain said.
 
The 2020 Settlement Agreement between General Electric and the Environmental Protection Agency mandated remediation efforts concerning polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination within the Housatonic River. This agreement stipulated that GE undertake cleanup operations while concurrently facilitating the exploration of advanced technologies for PCB mitigation. 
 
The Housatonic River was contaminated with PCBs and other chemical waste products by the General Electric Company between 1932 and 1977. The contamination stretches from Pittsfield, Massachusetts, through Connecticut, and into Long Island Sound.
 
Adams Park is less than a mile from GE's Boston office.
 
Town leaders, environmental experts, and even Lee Elementary School 4th grader Jenny Hogencamp will speak at the rally.
 
"Her family has a small farm and lives within a very short distance of the proposed UDF [Upland Disposal Facility] site," Brittain said.
 
Other people speaking will be Lee select board members Bob Jones, Sean Regnier and Gordon Bailey. State Representative Leigh Davis will speak as well as environmental and health advocates.
 
Brittain expressed that there are alternative methods to clean the Housatonic River, besides the UFD method specified in the cleanup permit. He wants to raise awareness about these other options.
 
"The permit does not set a minimum that GE has to take out of state, it only sets a maximum for what they have to book in the Berkshires in addition to that the permit also states the use of emerging technologies and alternative methods," said Brittain.
 
He claimed that the GE is only motivated by cost savings to avoid alternative PCB cleanups.
 
"There is a better way to do this clean up, and the company that polluted the river is not doing an adequate clean up in order for them to save money. That's the point we want to make at this event," he said.
 
Brittain stated that the Housatonic River Initiative will sponsor a bus for anyone who wishes to join them. Those interested can call him at (413) 409-5976 to reserve a seat. He also welcomed those who prefer to provide their own transportation and show their support.
 
"We're really excited for the lineup of speakers,” he said. “We have a lot of people joining us and we are really grateful for that and I think it should be a really good event."
 

Tags: Housatonic,   pollution,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Lee Stories