Pittsfield Braces for 'Difficult' Budget Season

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The upcoming budget cycle will be "difficult" and have no frills, officials say.

"As most of you know, I was sounding an alarm that I thought fiscal year 2026 was going to be pretty scary," Mayor Peter Marchetti told the City Council and School Committee on Wednesday.

"And although the governor's budget provided some clarity and some positive Chapter 70 numbers, there are still many challenges that we will face."

There is a potential increase of about 15 percent on the city's health insurance, which would add $4.5 million in expenses and is equal to the Chapter 70 increase. During the Massachusetts Municipal Association Conference at the end of January, officials were told that the increase for MIIA/ Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts is between 9 percent and 19 percent with an average of 14.8 percent.

"We win some we lose some and so I think this budget and the budget drivers that we have are going to be difficult," Marchetti said.

Finance Director Matthew Kerwood said the city still has to figure out exactly how much the increase will be.

"Don't hold me to this but what I can say with reasonable confidence is that looking at our trends, we are running below premium," he reported.

"We're running about 97 percent, 96 percent of the premium, which means our claims experiences are less than the premiums that we're paying in and that's right about where you want to be. If you're over, you automatically know you're going to be above the average so hopefully we can be below that 14.8 percent."

Other expense drivers include wages as all city union contracts will expire at the end of June, a 5.2 percent increase in the retirement contribution raising it to $18.3 million, and a 9.5 percent increase in long-term debt totaling nearly $12 million.

The city has about $8.2 million in free cash, about $421,000 less than FY24.

The $215,955,210 budget for fiscal year 2025, with $114.7 million on the city side and $82.6 million for the schools. The city has spent more than $42.4 million so far and the schools have spent $46.2 million.

With an estimated levy of $119.3 million, more than $81.3 million in state aid, nearly $14 million in local receipts, and $1.5 million in free cash, the city expects to take in $216,137,374 in fiscal year 2026.

Kerwood emphasized that the levy is an estimation, as "we don't actually know what the maximum levy is until we get into the conversation about, under Proposition 2.5, what our new growth is going to look like."

As much as 92 percent of the city budget is obligations such as salaries, health insurance, 401K, and other contributions the city has to make.

"The discretionary is very limited unless you really want to start reducing services or— it doesn't mean there aren't efficiencies in there. It doesn't mean there aren't ways to be able to do things differently," Kerwood said, pointing to smaller efficiencies that the city could make like not printing direct deposit receipts.



Councilor at Large Earl Persip III warned that the public will not see many motions to cut the budget during deliberations.

"Because there's not much to cut because it's mostly staff," he said. "So pre-empting everybody before it's budget time. There's no flashy stuff in this budget."

Marchetti also provided a five-year review of the city's tax information. The average single-family home value has increased by 44.8 percent from FY21 to FY25, now valued at $295,292.

"I guess the upside of that is when residents have more value in their homes, they have increased equity and improved financial security," he said. "When values go up, our tax rate can decrease, which has been the case over the last five fiscal years where we saw a decrease in the rate of 6.8 percent."

Since FY21, the average tax bill has increased by $275 per year because of rising property values, which is expected to continue for the next couple of years.

Marchetti reported that he had a 24.5 percent tax increase because of a significant rise in the value of his home, the tax bill nearly doubling in the past nine years.

"And so that's the stuff that we're competing against," he said.

Pittsfield is on the lower end of home values, higher to mid-range for the tax rate, and in the overall mid-range for tax bills.

Marchetti highlighted the services that Pittsfield residents receive, including trash, a full-time fire and police department, 14 schools, and 205 miles of roads that are maintained.

"We also need to take a look at the variety of services that we offer in Pittsfield, and yes, number one is still curbside trash and recycling collection and disposal in the city of Pittsfield," he said.

"Regardless of the changes we made, those are still services that we provide for the residents of Pittsfield that many other communities do not get provided with their tax dollars."

Just days into the mayor's first term, the City Council asked him to present a "close to level-funded" budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

"I will say for this year's budget process, I am not going to be sending department heads on the fool's errand," Marchetti reported.

"I am asking them to provide me with the budget that they believe is best to run their departments, staying within certain guidelines. We're not going to play ‘give me a level service, give me a level-funded, give me a 5 percent reduction,' because I don't think that that is a fruitful use of our time."


Tags: fiscal 2026,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories