image description
Mayor Peter Marchetti is asking for an ordinance that would make loitering in a median strip illegal as a public safety measure.

Pittsfield Looking at Median Safety Policy

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A conversation about median safety has risen from the grave.

Last week, the City Council referred Mayor Peter Marchetti's request to add a section in the City Code for median safety and pedestrian regulation in public roadways to the Ordinances and Rules Subcommittee.

In 2023, Marchetti requested an ordinance banning people from standing on median strips unless crossing the street. Panhandling has been a prevalent topic since the city's rise in homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic, but this effort was said to be centered around public safety.

"As some of you may remember, I had originally proposed a similar ordinance back in 2023 as a city councilor as there have been concerns about public safety at several intersections, including West and Center, East and First, South and East Housatonic, and all intersections in Allendale and Park Square," the mayor explained during his Jan. 27 episode of One Pittsfield.

"In order to approve the safety of all of these locations, I am reintroducing the safety median ordinance for the council's review, and at the Ordinances and Rules subcommittee, we will supply the public safety data that we have in regards to these intersections."

He has proposed adding Chapter 14, Section 14-12.1 "Median Safety and Pedestrian Regulation in Public Roadways."


The ordinance states that every pedestrian has the right to use public ways in the city except where pedestrian travel is expressly or prohibited by law, regulation, signage, road closure, or other safety or emergency factors.

"Notwithstanding the right of pedestrians to use public ways within the City of Pittsfield, the City of Pittsfield has experienced an increase in public safety issues relating to pedestrian use of and entry into the public roadways identified herein, for which a significant public safety need has arisen requiring implementation of this median safety and pedestrian regulation ordinance," it reads.

This is applicable within 100 yards of the intersection of West Street and Center Street, East Street and First Street, South Street and East Housatonic Street, and all of the intersections at Allendale Shopping Center and Park Square. Any person found to violate this section would be subject to criminal and noncriminal penalties.

Under the ordinance it is unlawful for any pedestrian to:

  • Walk along and upon an adjacent roadway whenever a sidewalk, median, crosswalk, center traffic island, or safety island is available for pedestrian use.
     
  • Leave an available sidewalk, median, crosswalk, center traffic island, or safety island and enter the path of any motor vehicle on a roadway.
     
  • Utilize a sidewalk, median, crosswalk, center traffic island, or safety island to impede traffic flow or endanger themselves, other pedestrians, or motorists.
     
  • Stand, sit, or lie down in any roadway, sidewalk, median, crosswalk, center traffic island, or safety island with the intent to obstruct or hinder the free and safe passage of pedestrians or motor vehicles.

Additionally, it stipulates:

  • Where sidewalks, medians, crosswalks, center traffic islands, or safety islands are unavailable, a pedestrian should use an unfinished shoulder of a roadway and avoid traveling or entering the roadway
     
  • A pedestrian shall not enter a public way into the pathway of motor vehicles traveling on and along the roadway or approach within five feet of a motor vehicle or vehicles using a roadway.

Tags: ordinance & rules ,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories