Dalton Planners to Discuss Movable Tiny Homes Bylaw

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board will discuss how to proceed with a proposed movable tiny homes bylaw during its meeting on Feb. 19. 
 
Accessory Dwelling Unit subcommittee member Amy Turnbull expressed her frustration with the board's delay in taking action on the proposal to authorize movable tiny homes if certain requirements are met.
 
A movable tiny home is defined as a unit under 400 square feet that meets all of someone's daily needs, including sanitation, cooking, and other facilities, and which is also mobile.
 
The board has been discussing the fate of tiny homes since last February, following a presentation by Tiny Home Industry Association President Dan Fitzpatrick. 
 
During the meeting, Fitzpatrick demonstrated the benefits of movable tiny homes for buyers and community members, including its affordability, energy efficiency, and ease of location, hookup, and maintenance. 
 
The only difference between movable tiny homes and ADUs is that movable tiny homes have wheels, he said. 
 
During the Jan. 15 meeting, Turnbull emphasized that movable tiny homes are also more affordable. 
 
The movable tiny home would need to be licensed and registered with the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles and be certified that it meets requirements set by the American National Standards Institute or the National Fire Protection Association standards, Turnbull's proposal says. 
 
A common misconception that often concerns residents is the idea that movable tiny homes are conventional travel trailers or motorhomes, Fitzpatrick said, but they are not. Movable tiny homes are built to resemble a typical cottage or bungalow.
 
Turnbull initially proposed an amendment to the town's ADU bylaw to permit movable tiny homes, provided they meet the same requirements established by the bylaw that was passed in 2022.
 
The bylaw allows detached ADUs by special permit, and ADUs within an existing structure would not require a special permit. 
 
Since the vote, however, the state has updated its law to allow ADUs up to 900 square feet without local zoning approval if they meet specific requirements. This state law is effective starting in February. 
 
The town's bylaw is more restrictive than the state law so, the board needs to update its bylaw to align with the state.
 
In December, the board voted to amend its Accessory Dwelling Unit bylaw one step at a time to make it more agreeable to voters. 
 
During that meeting, board members said separating the ADU bylaw from the mobile/movable tiny house regulation would prevent confusion because it would allow each issue to be addressed clearly and distinctly.
 
"Honestly, whether we ever get back to that movable part and decide on it as a planning board, my feelings are that it probably won't go there, and I think between the two of us, we're just going to file a petition, and get enough signatures and have it on the ballot anyway," Planning Board member Jarred Mongeon said during January's meeting.
 
During the January meeting, Turnbull also argued that the board does not need to rush to update the bylaw because the change in state law makes the current bylaw unenforceable.
 
She highlighted how working to adjust the bylaw is a waste of time, considering how the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities is drafting regulations to provide clarity on how towns can administer the new ADU law. 
 
"There's been a lot of talk about how really this bill by [Gov. Maura Healey] has done nothing to help ADUs because it does not address dimensional setbacks…[or] lot coverage, and there's some concern about that," she said.
 
Turnbull recommended postponing updating the town's ADU bylaw to comply with the new state law and discuss movable tiny homes. 
 
"I would like you guys to vote on it next month because I want to know how you sit with that. I want it to be officially stated you support it or you don't support it, and I'm hoping that when you do that, you say, why," Turnbull said. 
 
"So, that Jared and I can go forward and either do a petition, which I'm not in favor of, because I really want you guys to be on board with it, and I'm willing to spend another year on it because I think it's important."

Tags: ADU,   tiny homes,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories