image description
Superintendent Joseph Curtis reviews the deadlines for making recommendations on the middle school restructuring.

Pittsfield's Middle School Restructuring Panel Preparing Recommendation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Middle School Restructuring Committee will form a proposal in the next couple of weeks.

On Monday, members divided into groups to prepare for a consensus that is expected on Feb. 10.  The two-year effort to rework Pittsfield's middle school model will conclude with a recommendation to the School Committee on February 12.

A grade configuration that retains sixth grade in elementary school has risen to the top as the most popular option.  However, the committee could also recommend spending more time on the proposal.

"This really did not begin as a middle school conversation," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

He reminded the group that this conservation was originally about replacing the city's open space schools, Morningside Community School and Crosby Community School, but evolved to focus on middle schools. State Rep. Tricia Farley Bouvier secured funding for a districtwide study and it became clear that the project was wider reaching.

As the study done by DRA Architects evolved, it began to center around the prospect of providing universal prekindergarten, which the current model doesn't provide space for.

"Also, there was a motivation for our students to experience greater parity no matter where they live in our city," Curtis explained. "If you have been a member or educator at our schools with higher poverty rates, you know some of the realities with that."

He reflected on his career formerly working at Conte and Morningside, adding, "There's so many realities which I won't get into tonight."

A FAQ sheet shows Conte has nearly 90 percent low-income students and Williams Elementary School has less than 34 percent. Curtis noted that teacher retention and performance rates show similar trends.

During a budget workshop last week, he reported that about 71 percent of attending PPS students are living in poverty. This pushed the city into Group 11 for Chapter 70 funding.



There was also a desire to provide more focused, grade-specific cohorts of students.

"If we wanted to take the open space schools out of service and Crosby as well, we can't just take those three buildings out of service and have all the kids go to the rest of the schools," he said, noting that each school would have to hold 500 students.

This is where the grade alignment discussion began.

The favored alternative grade alignment is divided by: Universal PK-1, 2-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-SP.

Curtis pointed out that there were 13 restructuring presentations last year coupled with a survey.

"It was the alignment that was talked about the most and why was it talked about the most? No matter how you might feel about it, it's the alignment that can work the best, with a building project in our existing buildings," he said.

"I will say it's still not perfect, though."

Running parallel to this is an effort to rebuild Crosby Elementary School and Conte on Crosby's site.  The project was accepted into the Massachusetts School Building Authority's queue and the City Council will vote on a feasibility study by Halloween.

The study, estimated to cost about $1.5 million, is a part of the 80 percent reimbursable costs from the MSBA.


Tags: grade reconfiguration,   middle school,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories