image description
Superintendent Joseph Curtis spoke during the school districts first budget workshop of the year.

Over 70 Percent of Pittsfield Students Are in Poverty

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — More than 70 percent of Pittsfield Public School students are living in poverty, a situation that has led to the city's inclusion in "Group 11," which provides additional resources but highlights a troubling reality.
 
On Wednesday, during the district's first budget workshop for fiscal year 2026 at Reid Middle School, it was announced that Pittsfield Public Schools expects a $4.4 million increase over FY25, totaling more than $68 million.
 
This increase comes in part due to a nearly $60 billion spending plan for fiscal year 2026 filed by Gov. Maura Healey, which includes $7.3 billion in Chapter 70 aid to school districts — an increase of $420 million from the previous year.

"Our enrollment has increased slightly but so has our students living in poverty," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"So we are very close to 71 percent of our attending students living in poverty. This is a very close number to our other urban counterparts, Worcester being an example, and so as our poverty rate continues to grow, it did solidify us being in Group 11."

Earlier this month, Jennifer Stokes, assistant superintendent for school transformation and accountability, reported that there have been 70 unhoused students in the district since September.  This is 20 more than the previous year.

"The numbers, in my opinion, are quite high," she told the Homelessness Advisory Committee.

Twenty-two of those students are in a shelter, six are in a motel or hotel, 30 are doubled up with friends and family, and 16 of those students were also homeless last year. Seven of the unhoused students are immigrants from the state emergency shelter housed at the Hilton Garden Inn and 24 are new to the district and have moved to Pittsfield in shelters or as part of an unhoused family.

Wednesday's workshop kicked off the FY26 budget discussion.

"This is critically important that we are introducing you to a budget exercise. We begin to prepare for our budget typically at the end of October, early November, and at that time, as you can well imagine because we just found out today, we don't have any idea of what our Chapter 70 allocation will be in October, November," Curtis explained.

"But we also recognize that we can't start thinking about the next year's budget in January, right? We need to start having discussions, having our principals start to think about resources and allocations for the next year."

The school budget adoption is set for April 9 and the School Committee will meet with the City Council no later than June 1.  

The budget exercise assumed a level-funded budget as a baseline with an estimated $4 million in contractual obligations.  Curtis stressed that this is an exercise and not a proposal.



Principals and central office members were provided with their total current staffing budget and asked to reduce it by 6.65 percent by identifying instructional and operational staff that could be reduced.

"This was important because we wanted them to start discussions, not only amongst themselves but with their colleagues, their school councils, really having those discussions related to the possibility of a level-funded budget," Curtis said.

"But as you know, even when a budget is level funded, we have to account for the upcoming year's contractual obligations and again, I want to stress that we're estimating."

In three groups, School Committee members, staff, and students reviewed student demographics, building administrations, school improvement plan key focus areas, and FY25 reductions for each school and the central office.

Last year, local and statewide advocacy led to a correction in Chapter 70 funding, adding another $2.4 million in aid for fiscal year 2025.

The state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, bumping the district back into a higher reimbursement group.  The district had missed the cut by 0.04 percent, or two students, costing the district millions in state education aid but this was found to be a technical error.
 


Tags: budget,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories