image description
The march makes its way down North Street before gathering for speakers at Park Square.
image description
image description
image description
image description
March organizer Meg Arvin of Western MA 4 the Future says it's important to build community as a bulwark against oppression.
image description
Councilor at Large Alisa Costa told attendees to use whatever privilege they have to stand up and make sure they represent people who can't be there.
image description

Progressives March for Human Rights in Pittsfield

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Amelia Gilardi addresses the crowd at Park Square. 
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Around 100 people marched down North Street on Saturday in support of human rights. 
 
The Pittsfield People's March was designed to unite community members, raise awareness, and promote the fundamental rights of all people. It was one of numerous marches across the nation, including in Boston and the annual one (formerly the Women's March) in Washington, D.C. 
 
The marches started in 2017 in response to the first election of Donald Trump, who is set to sworn in for a second term on Monday. Saturday's marchers expressed their fears that the incoming administration will place money and power over the needs of the people. 
 
"For me, the motivation of this march was to make people see that we are all feeling similarly, that we are not isolated in our feelings, and that your neighbor feels like that, too," said march organizer Meg Arvin of Western MA 4 the Future.
 
"So one, it's not just you thinking this way, and two, you have other people that you can lean on to build that community with to feel like you are not in this by yourself and that you have other people who will be here to support you."
 
The first march, and its successors, have focused on fears of rights being chipped away, including women's bodily rights, free speech rights, voting rights and civil rights. The first Washington march drew nearly 500,000; Saturday's was estimated at 5,000.
 
Arvin, who moved from Tennessee a few years ago, said she comes from a state where rights have been taken away and knows what it looks like for people to be desperate for representation.
 
While recognizing that Massachusetts is more progressive than its southern counterparts, she said the incoming presidency should alarm us all that "everything is up for grabs."
 
"You are worthy of being pissed off with all of this," the activist told fellow progressives at Park Square, "I'm pissed with you."
 
"Everything you do counts," Arvin told the crowd.
 
"Sending an email, making a phone call, sending mass texts, doing the postcarding, voting, standing behind a candidate, shouting into the void about being pissed off. None of us are going to be complacent. Complacency is what got us here."
 
She said just because Massachusetts is a blue state doesn't mean that it's guaranteed to stay blue.
 
"You have to fight. Everything we've done and everything we've won has been a fight," Arvin asserted.
 
"Don't let the people out here with the dog whistles shouting about how we are intolerant left get you down. We are tolerant but we will not put up with abuse or bad behavior or bad policy or bad politicians, bad representation. We deserve better. We know that's why we are here because we care about our community."
 
Councilor at Large Alisa Costa told attendees to use whatever privilege they have to stand up and make sure they represent people who can't be there.
 
"We can't just sit here and say 'Well, I disagree and that's it,'" she said.
 
"We have to call our elected officials. We have to get our friends out to vote, even in local elections because almost everybody who is on the national stage now has at one point won a local election. So please talk to your neighbors even if it is uncomfortable and talk about your values and what you share in those values and why you vote the way that you do."
 
High schooler Amelia Gilardi said people are marching for different reasons but for the same cause: to defend their rights, freedom, and future.
 
"We're marching in solidarity with each other, with marginalized groups, and those who feel like their voices aren't heard," she said. "We're marching to remind those in power the change on the issues that matter most to us in Western Mass is happening too slowly or not at all."
 
Gilardi called for freedom of speech, freedom of choice, freedom to "love who we love," and freedom to be protected from PCBs, radio frequency radiation, and "everything unfair going on."
 
She and her mother, Courtney Gilardi, have called for protection from RF radiation since a Verizon cell tower was erected near their home in 2020.
 
Reflecting on her time in Tennessee, Arvin observed that people are more comfortable being and expressing themselves in Massachusetts.
 
"I don't want to blanket the South as like, a bunch of intolerance because that's not true," she said, adding that while the commonwealth has its pockets of conservatism, it is a lot more accepted to have a visible difference here.

Tags: march,   protests,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories