image description
A Casella waste truck collects trash and recyclables in Pittsfield recently.

Pittsfield Council to See Recycling Contract, Trash Presentation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Trash talk is back on Tuesday's City Council agenda with a proposed five-year extension for recycling services and a presentation on the new toter system.

Mayor Peter Marchetti has brought forward a year contract beginning on July 1 with the Department of Environmental Protection and WM Recycle America, LLC for processing the city's recyclables.  Pittsfield's current contract with the DEP for recycling at the Springfield Material Recycling Facility expires on June 30.

The new proposal includes a provision for an annual processing fee adjustment of one percent of the prior year's processing fee beginning next year and a tonnage fee adjustment will apply when annual tonnage falls below the baseline of 16,800 tons.

"The amendments also address financial adjustments for tonnage variations, increase incentives for reducing contamination, and ensure stability in operational costs. Importantly, there are no changes to the list of acceptable recyclable materials, preserving consistency for residents," Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales wrote to the council.

"This extension is critical for maintaining Pittsfield's commitment to sustainable waste management practices and ensuring the continued availability of regional recycling infrastructure."

Processing fees and revenue sharing are not proposed to change.  

The annual processing fee increase of 2.5 percent per ton is the same percentage in the original agreement. When the average market value is below the processing fee, the AMV is deducted from the processing fee and when the AMV exceeds the processing fee, 70 percent of the AMV is paid to the community.

Under the contract, the processing fee would start at $105.79 per ton in the first year and increase to $116.77 per ton in the fifth.  The cumulative annual processing fee adjustment of one percent would be $4.39 per ton in the fifth year.


A table in the meeting materials outlines the tonnage fee adjustment for less than 14,000 tons to over 16,800 tons. If the city exceeds 16,800 tons, it will not be charged an adjustment fee and if it is below 14,000, fees per ton range from $17.50 in the first year to $19.32 in the fifth year.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III requested a comprehensive report addressing the implementation of the trash and recycling program launched last fall. He also requested a list of trash and recycling pickups designated for properties with more than three-family units, which shows there are 3,883 residential units within properties with more than three-family units in the city, and of those, 304 properties have exactly four living units.

The administration reported that there have been 34,476 taters delivered under the initial rollout.  All remaining deliveries are expected to be completed by Jan. 15.

It is reported that trash has decreased consistently in the last three months to an average of 1,024 tons per month from an average of 1,388 tons per month. In that time frame, recycling has increased to an average of 201 tons per month from an average of 148 tons per month.

This is attributed to about 50 tons eliminated from the 420 households removed from the program, the limited size of the toters leading to a reduction in heavier waste, no more trash being brought in from neighboring towns, and eligible residents opting out of the program.

Morales wrote that the program is on track to reduce household trash output by more than 16 percent annually, representing a significant step toward meeting waste diversion and sustainability goals.  He anticipates that as residents continue to adjust, there will be further reductions and efficiencies.

"The automated system and taters have played a critical role in shifting waste management behaviors. The sharp rise in recycling rates and the decline in trash tonnage align with the program's goals of reducing waste sent to landfills and increasing recycling efficiency," he wrote.

"Seasonal factors, such as reduced yard waste in winter months, may have contributed to the declining trash volumes, but the data strongly indicates program success in encouraging waste diversion. The program's first three months demonstrate encouraging trends toward waste reduction and recycling improvement. Continued community engagement and education will be crucial to sustaining and building on these achievements."


Tags: trash,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories