Dalton Public Safety Panel Talks Facilities Fund

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — Public Safety Advisory Committee members have discussed a proposal to establish a public facilities stabilization fund. 
 
The town does not have a stabilization fund dedicated to future public facility projects, including potential needs for construction and renovation of town buildings. 
 
This fund would be a way for the town to proactively save money for construction or renovation projects of public buildings, said Finance Committee member Thomas Irwin. 
 
A fund like this would save up funds to address unexpected repair needs or new construction without depending on temporary funding such as from the American Rescue Plan Act and relieve some additional funding obstacles. 
 
The town does have a capital stabilization fund and a general stabilization fund. 
 
The capital stabilization fund can be used for future capital expenditures such as building repairs or infrastructure projects. 
 
The general stabilization fund has a broader purpose so can be used to handle unexpected emergencies or other things that are not considered capital projects. 
 
There is about $2 million between the capital and general stabilization funds, Town Manager Tom Hutcheson said. 
 
To establish the fund they would first have to present the idea to the finance committee chair to determine if it is feasible, Irwin said. 
 
After the Finance Committee's discussion on the idea, the proposal would have to be made to the town manager and Select Board, he said. 
 
Finally it would have to be added to a town meeting warrant and approved by voters, Irwin said. 

Tags: public safety committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories