image description
The School Building Needs Commission accepted MSBA's letter of invitation into the 270-day eligibility module for the proposed Conte/Crosby project.

Pittsfield Crosby/Conte Feasibility Years From Completion

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— If local approval is secured in the fall, the district will have 2 1/2 years to complete a feasibility study for the Crosby/Conte school project.

The eligibility period for Massachusetts School Building Authority funding begins on Feb. 3 and will conclude on Oct. 31 with a vote from the City Council. In that time, a number of boxes have to be checked off including enrollment studies and maintenance and capital planning.

Last week, the School Building Needs Commission accepted MSBA's letter of invitation for the eligibility period and a 270-day eligibility module. The timeline requires a school building committee that oversees the project formed by early April, making Pittsfield somewhat ahead of the game.

"This letter was received in pretty quick fashion after the board meeting on Friday, Dec. 13, where myself, Mayor [Peter] Marchetti, and other school and city officials attended and at that board meeting, they announced that they would be accepting our statement of interest into the 270-day eligibility period," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

He emphasized that this is not an invitation to conduct a feasibility study. A feasibility study agreement must occur within the eligibility period, establishing the process and parameters for reimbursement and giving 913 days for the study and schematic design.

The School Committee and City Council are set to vote on the funds for the study, about $1.5 million with 80 percent reimbursement, before Oct. 31.

The district is seeking funding for a combined build of Crosby Elementary School and Silvio O. Conte Community School at 517 West St. The invitation is for grades prekindergarten to 5 and the potential to examine the consolidation of Crosby with Conte and relocating fifth-grade students from the two elementary schools to the middle schools, serving prekindergarten to fourth grade.

Another option in the Crosby/Conte plan is the potential to house grades prekindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another, with both maintaining their own identities and administrations.

"A big part of this, and it says right in their letter of invitation, is to make sure that you're providing the state the ability to ascertain that you are actually ready to move forward and be successful," said Greg Smolley of DRA Architects, who conducted a study of the district.

"They do not like to get behind projects that they don't feel have a chance of success so a lot of the advice at this point is to make sure that the community of Conte and Crosby is engaged, understands what's happening, that the communication with the public as a whole is focused on keeping this moving and making sure that everyone understands what those deadlines are."

Commissioner Judith Gitelson presented a petition with about 60 signatures requesting that any rebuild be net zero. She emphasized the importance of protecting students from greenhouse gas emissions and said a sustainable build would cost the same or less.


Smolley said MSBA is one of the best funding organizations for this.

"They encourage it. They're really pushing it," he said.

"The designers love it. You just need to know about it from the beginning when you're putting together your budget for the feasibility study and your budget for the project. You need to have this as something that you want to do but we're fortunate to live in a state with a school building authority that is really championing this."

At the beginning of the meeting, Berkshire Environmental Action Team Executive Director Jane Winn asked that when choosing a design team, passive house standards and an all-electric design be specified.

"This is now happening, especially in the eastern part of the state," she said.

"But we need a design team with experience in this type of building because once it's built, it will save so much money on heating and cooling."

Running parallel to the Crosby/Conte proposal is the efforts of the Middle School Restructuring Committee, which is expected to put recommendations in front of the School Committee next month. It has been researching grade spans and data outcomes, educational models for middle-year grade spans, and reviewing current district policies that will be affected by any grade span change.

While the proposal is not under the restructuring committee's purview, the efforts coincide.

"Recommendations could range from something specific to a delay in the timeline, additional study," Curtis told the committee on Monday.

He explained that the original intention of the restructuring was to coincide with the opening of the new building but the School Committee felt it needed to be researched and addressed sooner.

The Crosby/Conte build would not be expected to be completed until 2029.


Tags: Conte School,   Crosby School,   crosby/conte school project,   MSBA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories