CBRSD to Reconvene Regional Agreement Panel

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — After an outcry of concern from residents in several small towns in the Central Berkshire Regional School District, the district will investigate how to adjust its proposed update of the regional agreement. 
 
The district has been functioning without an approved regional agreement since 1968. The agreement was updated in 1997 but received approval only from the towns, not the state commissioner. 
 
For over a year, the district has been working to bring the agreement up to date with state law. 
 
"It's been a long time we've been operating without approval. State law is we're supposed to be operating with approval," School Committee Chair Richard Peters said. 
 
"Obviously, we operate under the state law, and that trumps anything we do in a regional agreement."
 
Although state law requires that a district have an approved regional agreement, the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education does not penalize a district that does not have a state-approved regional agreement, Vice Chair David Stuart said. 
 
"The way it was explained to me is that it's essentially a legal review to make sure that we're not doing anything that's against the law," he said.  
 
The district established a Regional Agreement ad hoc committee and received aid from Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools consultants Stephan Hemman and Jay Barry. MARS consults districts on creating regional agreements between towns. 
 
After a year of work, however, the proposed draft failed last spring in three of the district's seven towns over concerns surrounding its voting method
 
The towns that voted against the regional agreement wanted the vote for debt incurrence to be town-by-town rather than a popular vote. 
 
The concerns stem from the School Committee's 2019 decision to vote by popular vote for the approximately $72 million Wahconah Regional High School building project. 
 
"The [ad hoc] committee did work for a very long period of time, endless hours, and hashed everything out with the town people as well; however, that being said, I don't think it's a good idea to return the regional agreement and vote on it without addressing it again," said School Committee member Barbara Craft-Reiss. 
 
"I think it's almost a slap in the face, and I wouldn't support that at all. I think the community is telling us they want to talk about it more, and I think we have to respect the community."
 
Fellow School Committee members agreed and voted during the December meeting to reconvene the ad hoc committee to adjust the draft based on the communities' comments. 
 
The committee was comprised of representatives from the seven towns and School Committee members. 
 
This new ad hoc committee would be composed of different people because most of the School Committee members involved have since left. 
 
The main issue in the agreement is Chapter 71, Section 14D, which outlines the methods for incurring debt. 
 
"The proposed regional agreement right now does have both methods of voting in it. And then the way it reads right now is that a town-by-town is the preferred method," Superintendent Leslie Blake-Davis said. 
 
"So, you could take that back to a regional ad hoc, and you could work on that language so that that language is more acceptable to some of the towns." 
 
Rather than starting over, the ad hoc committee can work on strengthening the language around a default voting method for incurring debt since that is the communities’ primary concern. 
 
Hinsdale Town Administrator Robert Graves emphasized the history behind the concerns some towns have regarding the proposed language for incurring debt.
 
The concerns stem from a decision to vote by popular vote for the approximately $72 million Wahconah Regional High School building project. Most of the present members of the School Committee were not in office at the time of this vote in 2019. 
 
The vote in favor of the high school project was just over 51 percent of which more than half was from Dalton. Becket and Washington voted in favor but Cummington, Hinsdale, Peru, and Windsor voted against.
 
Graves explained that some of the communities considered filing a lawsuit following the 2019 decision but didn’t have the resources to do so. 
 
Communities have been urging the school district to work toward reducing its budget because district towns are also trying to improve infrastructure and road work, among other expenses, Graves said. 
 
So, when the vote for the new school came around, some people felt blindsided, he said. 
 
Graves highlighted the importance of looking at that history to prevent it from happening again in the future.

Tags: CBRSD,   regional agreement,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories