image description

Pittsfield School Committee Chair Details PHS Investigation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — School Committee Chair William Cameron has provided additional details about the third-party investigation into alleged staff misconduct at Pittsfield High School.

On Monday, the committee authorized him to negotiate and execute a retainer agreement with law firm Bulkley Richardson Gelinas of Springfield for "independent and impartial investigations of certain Pittsfield Public School employees."

A second investigation by a different firm will target the district's internal processes.

Mid-week, Cameron forwarded iBerkshires answers to a list of queries from news blogger Dan Valenti of PlanetValenti.com "in order to ensure that I am providing the same explanation of what is taking place to all Pittsfield news outlets."

The month of December saw three PHS staff put on administrative leave, including a dean who was arrested on drug-trafficking charges. The district is also facing a civil lawsuit over inappropriate conduct by a former teacher and a staff member who left earlier in the year is under investigation at his current workplace.

Mary-Lou Rup, a retired Superior Court judge, will be the lead investigator at a rate of $275 per hour and paralegal services are $110 per hour. The investigation is anticipated to begin on or after Jan. 2 and be completed on or before March 31.

"The three-month length of the agreement is precautionary," Cameron wrote. "At this time we have no reason to believe that the investigation will take as long as the agreement permits."

He said the total cost is indeterminate at the outset. 

"I will not venture to estimate how many hours it will take to conduct a thorough investigation, i.e., one that makes no presuppositions about culpability or credibility, and that will go wherever the evidence found will take it," he wrote.

Cameron relayed a suggestion that the city's liability insurer may bear the cost or some portion of it but "If that is not to be the case then the cost will be borne with public funds."

Members of the public and City Council have demanded answers, the council during a special meeting on Dec. 23 requesting that it "be included in the delivery of any disclosures, interim reports or findings submitted to the city."

Cameron said public progress reports on the investigation are not anticipated and the findings will be made public to the extent permitted by law.



"The School Committee will receive the investigator's final report," he wrote.

"What of that report's contents may be released thereafter, and what may not be released because of parties' legal rights to privacy, will have to be determined in consultation with legal counsel when the report is received.  The School Committee does not intend to withhold information or conclusions that it may legally publicize."

Rup's report will be the first of two documents occasioned by recent allegations of employee wrongdoing.  Another law firm will perform a process audit into three broad areas that "given what's alleged, warrant careful scrutiny."

This includes:

  1. The employment process of the Pittsfield Public Schools, including advertisements, interviews, reference checks, CORI and fingerprint checks, and hiring decisions.
     
  2. The school system's investigatory efforts prior to the allegations now being looked into in matters related to reports of employee misconduct.
     
  3. Areas where specific improvements in regard to these matters are recommended, including, but by no means limited to, training for building-level administrators in vetting candidates for employment, and the adequacy of the district's staffing for human resources management in an organization employing over 1,100 people.

Cameron has contacted Mirick O'Connell of Worcester for the second investigation. He reported that this firm serves as legal counsel to a number of school districts in eastern Massachusetts and "Importantly, it is also without ties to the City of Pittsfield, the School Committee, or any other party."

"To avoid confusion of roles, the process audit will commence upon completion of Judge Rup's investigations," he wrote. "The School Committee intends to make the final report received from the process audit available to the public."

The 100-year-old firm, Bulkley Richardson Gelinas, was chosen based on a recommendation from other attorneys, its tenure, and its experience with institutional investigations of employee wrongdoing.

Cameron boiled it down to three factors:

  1. BRG does not now and, according to the firm's records, has not ever had an attorney-client relationship with the City of Pittsfield, the Pittsfield School Committee, a current member of the School Committee, or any of those identified in certain news outlets as accused of wrongdoing during their employment by the Pittsfield Public Schools. 
     
  2. BRG has conducted investigations of employee wrongdoing for other school districts, albeit not in Berkshire County. 
     
  3. Rup will be the lead investigator of the accusations and facts. She served on the Superior Court bench for 26 years and, since retiring, has been the lead investigator in other districts' independent investigations of allegations against their employees.

Cameron said the criteria included the investigator and firm's independence from any connection to the city or district, the firm's professional reputation, its experience with this kind of investigation, and the legal credentials of the lead investigator.

CamHeeron said the methodology will be "straightforward."

"The firm will conduct a limited series of interviews of key witnesses, in particular of each of the individuals named herein, and anyone else who has or purports to have actual knowledge of what has been alleged against current or former Pittsfield High School administrators or educators against whom allegations of wrongdoing have been made; to seek out such other credible sources of information related to the various allegations that have been made as might be found in the course of the interviews; to form a professional judgment of what, based on whatever can be learned, substantiates or fails to substantiate the allegations that have been made; to make such recommendations to the School Committee as the investigator deems warranted as a result of what has been learned; and to provide the School Committee with a report of its findings."


Tags: PHS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories