image description

Pittsfield School Committee OKs Firm for PHS Staff Investigation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Officials approved a third-party investigation on alleged staff misconduct at Pittsfield High School that's expected to wrap up by March.

On Monday, the School Committee authorized Chair William Cameron to negotiate and execute a retainer agreement with law firm Bulkley Richardson Gelinas of Springfield for "independent and impartial investigations of certain Pittsfield Public School employees."

"We need to have a credible investigation with the public so that the public can have confidence there is not something being covered up here," Cameron said during the special virtual meeting, citing public suspicion that the administration knew about and failed to act on the allegations.

"This is an attempt for us to find out what somebody who has no stake of any sort in the outcome of what happens here, what someone with investigatory expertise has been able to come up with and make a report to us. It's up to us then to act in good faith on the basis of that report."

This month saw three PHS staff put on administrative leave, including a dean who was arrested on drug trafficking charges. The district is also facing a civil lawsuit over inappropriate conduct by a former teacher and a staff member who left earlier in the year is under investigation at his current workplace.

Mary-Lou Rup, a retired Superior Court judge, will be the lead investigator at a rate of $275 per hour and paralegal services for $110 per hour. Services are said to commence on Dec. 31 and be completed on or before March 31.

According to a draft agreement sent to Cameron, the scope of services includes conducting a limited series of interviews with key witnesses of past or current PHS administrators or educators with allegations against them, seeking out other credible sources and information related to the allegations made and found during interviews, forming a professional judgment that substantiates or fail to substantiate the allegations, making recommendations to the School Committee, and to providing a report of findings.

The 100-year-old firm was chosen based on a recommendation from other attorneys, its tenure, and its experience with institutional investigations of employee wrongdoing. The firm is not believed to have any relation to the city, the district, or members of the School Committee, and Cameron said Rup "seems to be about as impartial an investigator as we would be able to find."



Mayor Peter Marchetti pointed to last week's special City Council meeting where the public wanted answers.

"Because in my opinion, it's a public document, and everything and anything that comes forth in that document should be made available to the public with nothing redacted," he said.

Cameron didn't want to promise anything without a legal opinion but said, "whatever we are legally able to release, we should release."

Committee member Sara Hathaway said this agreement was not what she expected.

"I thought we would be looking at problems in our system more than looking at the allegations and frankly, the allegations are going to be addressed by the U.S. Attorney and the state DCF, is my understanding," she explained.

"So I thought we were going to look more at things like whether our social media practices need to change, whether our background and CORI check systems have flaws, whether the mandated reporting is occurring as it needs to occur. More these kinds of things about our system. Our human resources department is very skeletal in terms of staffing. Is that part of what we need to address? And I thought that was going to be the nature of the investigation and not so much looking into the allegations themselves."

Cameron said this is the first of two "internal inquiries," adding that a Boston law firm will audit the district's human resource practices, hiring, and staffing.


Tags: PHS,   scandal,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories