image description
Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre, the principal author of the motion of support an independent investigation of Pittsfield High, addresses Monday's special council meeting.

Pittsfield City Council Weighs in on 'Crisis' in Public Schools

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

A half-dozen people addressed the City Council from the floor of Monday's meeting, including Valerie Anderson, right.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — After expressing anger and outrage and making numerous calls for accountability and transparency, the 11 members of the City Council on Monday voted to support the School Committee in seeking an independent investigation into allegations of misconduct by staff members at Pittsfield High School that have come to light in recent weeks.
 
At the close of a month that has seen three PHS administrators put on administrative leave, including one who was arrested on drug trafficking charges, the revelation that the district is facing a civil lawsuit over inappropriate conduct by a former teacher and that a staff member who left earlier in the year is also under investigation at his current workplace, the majority of the council felt compelled to speak up about the situation.
 
"While the City Council does not have jurisdiction over the schools … we have a duty to raise our voices and amplify your concerns and ensure this crisis is met with the urgency it demands," Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey said.
 
About two dozen community members attended the special meeting of the council, which had a single agenda item.
 
Four of the councilors precipitated the meeting with a motion that the council join the School Committee in its search for an investigation and that the council, "be included in the delivery of any disclosures, interim reports or findings submitted to the city."
 
Last week, the School Committee decided to launch that investigation. On Monday, City Council President Peter White said the School Committee has a meeting scheduled for Dec. 30 to authorize its chair to enter negotiations with the Springfield law firm of Bulkley, Richardson and Gelinas to conduct that probe.
 
Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre, the principal author of the motion of support, was one of several members who noted that the investigation process will take time, and she, like Kavey, acknowledged that the council has no power over the public schools beyond its approval of the annual district budget.
 
"Even though the City Council really does have no authority in this area whatsoever, I think it's important for the City Council to publicly state we stand by the other elected officials in the city, and we're all going to face this problem head on," Serre said. "There won't be any scapegoating. There won't be any finger pointing. As the mayor said from the moment this came up, this is all going to be done in broad daylight.
 
"It's human nature to respond by demanding immediate change, but that's the anger response. No matter how justified our anger is, it is not what it takes to build a healthy Pittsfield High School community. We need to know the facts, and that's exactly what this petition will do."
 
Serre emphasized that she, too, acknowledges that changes are needed. But figuring out what went wrong is the first step to putting things right.
 
"I don't think any elected official would stand in front of you and say, 'This is OK,' " Serre said, addressing the constituents in the meeting room. "There will be changes down the road.
 
"But I think a fair, independent and open investigation, as the School Committee and mayor have already initiated, is the only way for this to move forward and make sure everybody has a chance."
 
Nine out of the 11 councilors Monday took advantage of their chance to speak to the motion on the table.
 
Council Vice President Earl Persip expressed frustration that the City Council has, in the past, told the School Committee that Pittsfield High has a culture problem but the problem persists.
 
"We are angry," Persip said. "It's OK to say you're angry. That doesn't change what we all want: the right outcome.
 
"The School Committee has not listened to us when we talk about the culture problem, and it's upsetting to me that this is ignored. It's your job to oversee the administration and make sure that they're doing what they need to be doing. That's why you were elected."
 
Persip echoed Serre's point in regard to the motion in question, saying, "We can't heal until we know what happened."
 
But he also went into specifics, questioning the hiring process that put some of the district's personnel in place.
 
"What are the hiring practices?" Persip asked. "We have a dean of students on a dance waiver? Come on. What are we doing? Enough is enough. I'll be the bad guy. I don't care. What are we doing?
 
"I'm hearing other things about other administrators in that building who are just getting licenses for higher education, not just elementary ed. I'm hearing the vice principal didn't have the right license. I don't know. But part of this investigation needs to be: who are we hiring and what leadership roles are they in?"
 
At the start of the meeting, White cautioned all in attendance that while Massachusetts law provides broad protections for comments in public meetings, "Any discussion about individuals by name or title carries risk and should be avoided.
 
"For open mic … speakers are not immunized against claims of defamation from individuals injured by those comments."
 
Most of the seven people who addressed the council during the open microphone portion of the meeting kept their comments general while conveying dismay about the allegations that have dominated public discourse in the city and attracted media attention from television stations in Albany, N.Y.
 
One who did not, Debra Simonetta, told the council members they were "all guilty of all this," because the City Council has oversight of the school district's budget. Simonetta went on to imply the administrator facing federal charges was hired not for his qualifications but because of his race, saying, "I guess his only qualification is he looks like Earl Persip."
 
At that point, Councilor at Large Kathleen Amuso interrupted Simonetta with a point of order, saying her comments were "unacceptable."
 
White attempted to remind Amuso that state law doesn't allow the council to censor public comments, banged his gavel as people started talking over one another and eventually called a five-minute recess after Simonetta yelled an obscenity from the podium.
 
At the other end of the spectrum, the open mic period, 2020 PHS graduate Elliott Loverin, who went on to earn a degree from Duke University, told the City Council that in his time at Pittsfield High, he was "victim blamed" and "intimidated" by an administrator at the school.
 
"The impact on my mental health was undeniable," Loverin said. "When COVID-19 ended my senior year early, I mostly felt relief that I would never need to spend another day at Pittsfield High School."
 
Another Pittsfield High alum, Brian Desrosiers, told the council that he is now in graduate school and is excited when he has a chance to return to his hometown.
 
"I would like to settle down here one day and start a family, but I would like to say the most recent allegations coming out of Pittsfield High School are disturbing to say the least," Desrosiers said.
 

City Council President Peter White calls for a five-minute recess after an outburst during the public comment portion of Monday's meeting.
Later, Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said the former students' remarks brought tears to her eyes and that she, as the parent of pre-school children, also has concern about putting her children in the city's school system.
 
One speaker who attended a different city secondary school offered another perspective.
 
Hinsdale resident Beth Anne DeGiorgis, who attended Miss Hall's School, noted that her alma mater has been shaken by different allegations of misconduct by staff going back to the 1990s.
 
She urged all elected officials, including the City Council and Mayor Peter Marchetti, who attended Monday's meeting, to push local legislators to pass a suite of reforms known as the Prevention Package which the advocacy group Enough Abuse says will help prevent child abuse in schools, youth organizations and communities.
 
Although the council did not take any action beyond the scope of the motion on the agenda, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren later referenced DeGiorgis' remarks as part of lengthy comments about the kinds of things he would like to see the independent investigator look into.
 
As White noted in opening the meeting, the scope of the investigation will be determined by the School Committee, the elected body that oversees the city's public schools.
 
Serre said that part of the reason for calling a special meeting was to give voice to community members' frustration.
 
"The reason we did this wasn't just to stand by the School Committee, but to make sure the public had more opportunity to speak," Serre said. "I think the mayor and the School Committee have both been very open in this whole process.  But this is just one more opportunity to get everybody together.
 
"This petition came out of a place of passion — not policy and, certainly, not politics. We're hurting."

 


Tags: PHS,   scandal,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories