image description
The Licensing Board approved a license for the new owners of the Nissan dealership in Pittsfield. The ownership transfer was to take place this week.

Pittsfield Licensing Board Greenlights Nissan Dealership

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Nissan of Pittsfield will operate under new ownership as "Bella Nissan of Pittsfield" after a problematic past.

On Monday, the Licensing Board approved a 2024 Class 1 auto dealer license for the 25 West Housatonic St. business. New owners Javier Columbie and Benjamin Farber want to turn the dealership around after it was investigated for failing to pay off the loans on trade-ins, among other complaints.

Bella Nissan of Pittsfield will have to pay a renewal fee for 2025, but the company wanted to prevent the business from "going dark" in the interim. During the meeting, the former license owned by Team Nissan Inc., which expires on Dec. 31, was revoked.

"Given what's happened with Team Nissan, their bad behavior, and given your very noble actions vis-a-vis the community, I think we're inclined, and I don't want to speak for everybody up there, but we're inclined to do what you want us to do," Chairman Thomas Campoli said.

The purchase agreement reportedly includes repaying liabilities — especially outstanding car loans —with funds held in escrow. Farber said affected consumers are the No. 1 priority, and then other entities such as landlords and banks will be repaid.

The closing documents were expected to take effect on Tuesday after Team Nissan signed off.

"There's actually still three vehicles belonging to customers who purchased vehicles there that were never paid off, like people had come and complained about," he explained.

"There are a few other people who, maybe you haven't heard from, who had some vehicles that weren't paid off. Part of those funds are being earmarked for that. There's funds to complete the registrations and get plates for everybody who's part of that."

A continued show-cause hearing was held for Nissan of Pittsfield last month, when the board heard from the Pittsfield Police Department, customers, and the new owners. Police Lt. Marc Maddalena said there were five individuals who had to make two car payments because of the business' practices and all were made whole though it "took a little bit of pulling some teeth."

"I'm very confident that they are going to take care of what they need to," said Denise Bouchard, a Nissan of Pittsfield customer who said she is paying nearly $600 a month when her original payment was supposed to be $560 for a car that needed repair the day after she drove it off the lot.


The board wanted to make sure that revoking the former license wouldn't benefit the licensee. It was made clear that the new owners need it revoked to operate in the next couple of weeks and ensure that customers and creditors are made whole.

"It allows the money to come in from our purchase of it, to take care of all a lot of the outstanding things," Farber said, explaining that there are tens of thousands of dollars owed in back rent alone.

He said Team Nissan "sort of hit a real cannot move forward point" last week when they weren't able to make payroll and they want the business to be taken over to resolve the issues.

"Without this deal actually being consummated. We won't have the ability to actually sell any cars," he said.

"We don't even have access to the finance paperwork to do any deals and things like that because that all comes from the manufacturer once this reaches fruition."

Board member Kevin Sherman was disappointed in Team Nissan's actions and that they did not show up for both hearings.

"If the revocation of the license and the immediate work by these gentlemen makes the vendors whole, landlords whole, and to me just as important, if not more importantly, the customers who deserve to have their agreements upheld if it makes them whole, I'm okay with revoking it," he said.

He applauded Farber and Columbie for being good businessmen to his knowledge and "wanting to make this work out for everybody."

Farber reported that they spent most of the day reviewing a closing schedule for the sale which deals with the purchase of the business and the debts that are being repaid.

"The fact is, the last two largest creditors, which are Nissan and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., which is a bank from Nissan, are basically scrambling for what's left because it's really pennies on the dollar from for what they're owed," he said.


Tags: license board,   automobiles,   dealership,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories