image description
Old Williamstown Road is blocked off by jersey barriers. Local residents say the abandoned state road is used frequently by pedestrians, bikers and horseback riders.

Lanesborough Residents Want Old Williamstown Road Barricades Gone

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Residents want the now-barricaded Old Williamstown Road reopened for pedestrian access.

Patty Barnaby, who lives on the road, started a Change.org petition that has garnered nearly 440 signatures. On Monday, she and other residents went before the Select Board, which will vote on a path forward on Dec. 30.

Barnaby explained that although the old Route 7 has been closed to vehicles for more than 40 years, pedestrians, horseback riders, bicycles, etc., use it. At the beginning of November, the state blocked it with jersey barriers.

"This is a state-owned piece of property, I am aware of that just so that is known," she clarified.

"So the state had come in and fully barricaded off this road. It's a 0.5 mile section of road that you can get through on both ends and the barriers were placed on each side of the road and although I know that this was technically a closed, abandoned road, it was always accessible to many Lanesborough residents, along with many other people who would visit the area to be able to enjoy the road and now we are not able to do so and it's actually very disheartening that this has happened."

Over the last 12 years, her family has walked the road "excessively." She said many Williamstown Road residents and supporters who know how much it means to the community were at the meeting. 

"That it has many memories, it has history," Barnaby said.

"We were always able to enjoy this road and even though it might not seem like a lot to some people, it means a lot to us and I would like to request from the Select Board and counsel some options that we can work with the state on in order to be able to open this back up to the public for pedestrian use."

Attorney Jeffrey Blake, of the town's counsel KP Law, feels that opening the road for passive recreation is "infinitely doable." He outlined a couple of different options: working with the state to install a gate or the state gifting it to Lanesborough to be accepted at a town meeting.

"Once the town owned it, it could, in fact, use it the way it wanted to. In my opinion, it could bar motorized vehicles from down there. It could put up a gate and it could have a trail for passive recreation, horseback, dog walking, bicycling, and the like," Blake said.

"So while I understand your frustration, I think that this problem is solvable. It just may take a little bit, because either way, we'll be working with the state and things just don't go as quickly as we want."

He added that the state would probably have to survey it and the town would have to "dot all our I's and cross all out T's."

"Having never spoken with the state about this, I don't know what their thoughts are on temporarily moving their jersey barriers so people can get through," he said.


"But that's certainly something the town could certainly ask in the interim and then flesh out how you want to go about doing it."

Selectman Timothy Sorrell emphasized that this was just a discussion.

"We're not going to meet again until December 30 and we'll bring it to the board for a vote of what our options could be and how we're going to go forward with it," he said.

"But we haven't forgotten about you. We want to make sure we do everything right and hopefully, we get it open for you people but we'll have a vote on it December 30."

Barnaby assumed that the town wouldn't like to take ownership of the road. Another resident suggested looking into the state Department of Conservation and Recreation taking it on.

Edward Carman said there are "real problems: with the state blocking an area to all public use but not blocking it to the use of the abutter," referencing a driveway located before the barriers.

"I don't know that the state can properly allow the abutter to use that land. They didn't block off any access from his land and then block off access for public use of the land, certainly not just by a unilateral decision of a field office," he said.

"The second piece is that it seems to me that there's got to be an agreement with the town of Lanesborough about where it's state responsibility and where it's town responsibility. The statute for discontinuing portions of state highways says that upon their discontinuation, they become town roads and that's what happened with the north end of it and the south end of it. It seems to me that there's got to be some kind of an agreement with the town about the parameters of that, about what the rights and responsibilities are."

Town Administer Gina Dario understands that the town maintains part of the road.

"It looks like the state said, 'We own the whole road, but we're going to close off the middle and you just maintain the two ends,'" Sorrell said, pointing out that there is one residence on one end and six houses on the other end.

Another Williamstown Road resident said the barriers are a safety hazard and others pointed to the importance of emergency access. 

"I just want the road back," Barnaby said.

Selectwoman Deborah Maynard emphasized that ATVs and the like are not permitted on the road and that some rebar needs to be removed for safety.


Tags: road closure,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories