MassDOT Releases Northern Tier Passenger Rail Study Final Report

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) announced the release of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Study final report. 
 
The Northern Tier Passenger Rail Study examined the benefits, costs, and investments necessary to implement passenger rail service from North Adams to Greenfield and Boston, with the speed, frequency, and reliability necessary to be a competitive option for travel along the corridor. 
 
"MassDOT is proud to announce the release of the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Study Final Report, which examines passenger rail service alternatives between North Adams, Greenfield, and Boston," said Transportation Secretary and CEO Monica Tibbits-Nutt. "Regional connectivity between west and east is a key priority as we imagine the future of transportation in Massachusetts. The Northern Tier Passenger Rail Study will be a valuable planning tool to identify service alternatives that can expand rail access, reduce congestion, and connect communities statewide." 
 
The conceptual planning study developed and assessed six options for rail service along the corridor. 
 
There were three overarching goals for the study: 
  • Support economic development along the Northern Tier corridor 
  • Promote transportation equity 
  • Minimize impacts on public health and the environment from transportation 
Public participation was critical in refining the study's goals and objectives, evaluation criteria, and the alternatives development process. The public involvement process included
four meetings with the stakeholder Working Group, consisting of federal, state, regional, and local representatives, three public information meetings, and a public workshop.  
 
Potential routes were developed and evaluated based on the established goals, objectives, and evaluation criteria, as well as identified challenges and opportunities. The process began with the development and evaluation of two potential routes representing lower investment and higher investment scenarios. With feedback from the Working Group and the public, the two initial routes were refined, and four additional routes were developed and assessed as part of Phase 2.  
 
Each option provided improved connectivity, mobility, and transportation choice in the Northern Tier corridor, with Alternative 3 (Electrified Service) and Alternative 4 (Full Local Service) achieving the highest ridership levels of the six potential routes. Higher ridership levels represent more reductions in vehicle miles travelled and reduced emissions. 
 
For more information and to review the final report, please visit the Northern Tier Passenger Rail Study website at

Tags: MassDOT,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories