Dalton Public Safety Group Split on Grant Funds

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Public Safety Advisory Committee is split on how to proceed in obtaining grant funding. 
 
During a meeting in November, some members suggested forming a subcommittee to work with the grant writer in identifying and pursuing grant funding sources.
 
However, other members expressed concerns that this may be premature before a feasibility study is complete.
 
During a meeting in September, the Select Board allocated $100,000 from the American Rescue Plan Act funds for a feasibility study and a grant consultant for a proposed public safety facility.
 
During that meeting, committee member Anthony Pagliarulo demonstrated the committee's findings thus far — that the current police station is not a viable option to house a 21st-century police facility
 
Pagliarulo recommended that each committee member do their due diligence and investigate grant opportunities available and report back to the committee. In addition, an attendee recommended that the committee designate the task to one person. 
 
The committee agreed to have the grant writer engaged in a limited capacity to identify grant monies that are available for planning activities rather than forming a separate subcommittee at this time. 
 
During the November meeting, Police Chief Deanna Strout expressed her confusion about why the committee is discussing applying for grants early in this process. 
 
"We don't have finances, we don't have a location, we don't have any information from a feasibility study. Why are we 10 miles ahead of where we need to be? Get the feasibility done," she said. 
 
"We don't need subcommittees yet. We aren't even close to that right now. I appreciate the thought process, but we are way far ahead of where we are." 
 
Strout agreed with the committee's previous steps of getting a grant writer on board. During a meeting in October, the committee met a consultant, Lisa Frisch. 
 
Frisch has a background in criminal justice and law enforcement and has been a consultant for grant writing for 20 years.
 
Strout said to let her, or whoever the grant writer they choose, evaluate what is out there but emphasized that she, the Police Department's executive assistant Rebecca Whitaker, Communications Director Gabrielle Taglieri, and others in the department apply for grants all the time. 
 
"It's what we do. We get more money in grants than any other department in this town," she said. 
 
Strout highlighted that grants have short deadlines and may not be available later in the process.
 
Committee co-Chair Don Davis agreed with Strout, adding that the committee doesn't know what they are going to get yet because it is unclear what is feasible. 
 
"We're way ahead of the curve. If we're trying to build a Cadillac, but we can only get a Toyota. We got to figure out what we're getting first, and then we can figure out where we can go get money to take that Toyota, to bring it up to a Cadillac," Davis said. 
 
"Before we even do that. I think that we have to have some input from the townspeople to see if this is even going to be a liable thing." 
 
Co-Chair Craig Wilbur argued that there are grants that repeat every year and emphasized the importance of exploring grant opportunities to lower the taxpayer burden for funding the new public safety facility and help the towns people feel more comfortable. 
 
"I'm not talking about going out and looking for every grant available for construction. What can we get in the next year that will help us advance this," he said. 
 
He also said there are grants available to help fund the pre-planning and planning activities that will get the project to the point of being shovel-ready. 
 
In a followup, Wilbur explained that such activities include schematic design, design development, and construction documents such as bid documents. 
 
It is hard to say how much these would cost, but based on the estimated cost of construction, these activities are typically 23 percent of construction cost, he said.

Tags: grants,   public safety committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories