image description
The business park's Site 9 has grown a lot greener over the past year.

Pittsfield's Site 9 Near-Complete, Funding Secured for Sites 7 & 8

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The William Stanley Business Park is transforming from grey to greener. Site 9 is nearly completed and funds have been secured to ready Sites 7 and 8 for development.

"Sixteen and a half acres of concrete have been cracked and crushed, the demarcation layer was put down, we brought all the fill from Site 7 over to Site 9 and we brought in over 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill and topsoil to put on there," Business Development Manager Michael Coakley told the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority on Thursday.

"Water quality basins have been installed, utility corridors were constructed, the roadways, the curbs, the sidewalks have been constructed, and the grass has now been planted and we're just about there, ready to go. What's left now are the surveys that need to be done."

Members recognized that it was a really exciting year for the organization. Work began on Site 9, the park's largest parcel, early this year, and by August, Mill Town Capital announced its intent to purchase 4.7 acres.

"It's never looked better," said Edward Weagle, principal geologist at Roux Associates.

The investment firm envisions a commercial building upwards of 20,000 square feet in the space.  Across the street at 100 Woodlawn Ave., Mill Town intends to build a mixed-use development that includes housing.

Coakley reported that the two entities are working on a purchase and sale agreement. The last action items are surveying for a grant of easement and restriction for environmental conditions (ERE) on the property, and an approval not required (ANR) plan for subdivisions.

During the meeting, it was announced that PEDA received a $500,000 Site Readiness Program grant from MassDevelopment for Site 7 and Site 8. The approximately 3-acre sites are across Woodlawn Avenue from Site 9 and border Kellogg Street.

Site 9 received an $800,000 Site Readiness Grant.


The state monies will cover costs associated with site investigation, characterization, surveying, conceptual planning, pre-permitting, design, estimating, and bid documents.

Coakley said he is taking the same approach with the smaller sites as he did with Site 9, using the readiness grant for preliminary work so that it can be bid-ready. It is estimated to cost between $5 million and $7 million.

Similar to Site 9 before it was overhauled, developers look at Sites 7 and 8 and can't envision the final product.

"This will get us up to the point where we'll know how much it's going to cost to do the work and have bids ready to go, and then we'll have to go for more money," Coakley explained.

"We'll have to go for grants to pay for the construction so this is pretty much the exact same thing we did over at Site 9."

Weagle reported that his firm did ground testing on 100 Woodlawn Ave. where Mill Town is planning a mixed-use building.

The team drilled several borings down about 20 feet and did not encounter groundwater but saw some contamination.  This is not seen as a concern and is attributed to the site's long-gone residential construction.

"The material that we identified is very typical of anthropogenic material that is present in urban areas that have been developed for over 100 years. One of the borings had a little bit of lead in it. I think it had about 220 or 230 parts per million. (The Department of Environmental Protection) Reporting Standard is 200 and that's for a residential scenario," he said, explaining that each contaminant qualifies for an exemption and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection does not have to be notified.

"But the developer will need to manage this material appropriately, as is pretty typical with any redevelopment in a previously developed environment."


Tags: business park,   PEDA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories