DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board on Tuesday voted to delay any action on setting a special election to fill its vacant seat until the town confirms that proper legal procedures were followed.
The board was shown a citizen petition with 237 signatures from residents calling for a special election and an election timeline created by Town Clerk Heather Hunt based on office activity levels.
Hunt recommended having the special election no earlier than Jan. 27, Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. Hunt was not present during the meeting.
An election should not be scheduled too early in January because the office will be busy with the census and dog license renewals, he said.
Before calling a special election, the board members wanted to consult the town attorney because they were concerned about whether they were acting in full compliance with state laws.
The decision was passed unanimously among present board members; Vice Chair Dan Esko was absent.
"In my opinion, everything up until this point is of questionable legalities, and that's why, at the meeting in September, I suggested that we consult with the town attorney before we do anything based on what's happened here," member John Boyle said.
"I mean, what could happen if you ignore these chapters and sub-chapters in Massachusetts General law and go and call an election without actually following all the steps — the election could be contested by a citizen in court and ruled invalid."
When contacted Wednesday, Hunt said she wished she had attended the meeting because she could have clarified board members' confusion.
On the day of the meeting, Hunt stated that she had spoken to Hutcheson several times to inquire if he would like her to attend. He declined, especially considering how busy the clerk's office has been given the presidential election and now being randomly being selected for a state post-election audit.
The state post-election audit is a lottery in which only 3 percent of precincts are selected.
"I really wish I was there because I feel like they had some information that was not correct, and I feel like it would have been helpful for me to provide them with correct information. Whether or not it would have changed the outcome, I doubt. I doubt that very much," Hunt said.
"I think the outcome was going to be the outcome either way, but I could have provided them with some details that, for some reason, they apparently didn't have."
During the meeting, Boyle presented several reasons that calling for a special election would go against state laws and could contested by a citizen in court and ruled invalid.
One reason was that the board never received any certified documentation or resignation letter regarding the Select Board vacancy.
Although Bishop obtained the email, he and Boyle claimed in a follow-up that they had not received a certified letter that had been notarized.
This type of documentation is state law, Boyle said, citing a section of Chapter 41 Section 10 which reads:
"If there is a resignation of a town officer creating a vacancy at some later time certain, and such resignation is filed with the town clerk in accordance with the provisions of section one hundred and nine, said town clerk shall certify a vacancy shall occur at the later time certain and the board of selectmen may call a special election …"
Hunt said she was surprised by the board's confusion as to whether Diver officially resigned, explaining that she received his letter of resignation in September, which they printed, date-stamped, filed, and forwarded to the board chair and vice chair.
"Joe Diver actually announced his resignation at a Select Board meeting. So, I took for granted that everybody knew that. Joe did everything by the book … if I was there in attendance, I certainly would have given that information to them again," she said.
"It wouldn't have been the first time we gave them that information, but we would have made sure that everybody felt comfortable with the fact that [Diver] did resign as of Oct. 1.
Boyle also questioned the validity of the citizen petition, stating that the process was not properly followed. He claimed that the petition should have been presented to the board and then given to the town clerk for certification.
However, Robert Collins, who previously ran for a seat on the Select Board and now serves on the Planning Board, took out the petition from the town clerk on Oct. 2.
Boyle again cited a section of Chapter 41 Section 10 which reads:
"If there is a failure to elect or a vacancy occurs in the office of selectmen, the remaining selectmen or selectman may call a special election to fill the vacancy and shall call such election upon the request in writing of two hundred registered voters of the town, or twenty percent of the total number of registered voters of the town, whichever number is the lesser; provided, that such request if filed with them or him not less than one hundred days prior to the date of the next annual election."
Boyle emphasized that the law states the request needs to be presented to "them," which refers to the Select Board. This was not done, he said.
Collins worked with Thomas Irwin and several other supporting town members to gather signatures for his petition, which garnered 237 signatures.
On Oct. 17, Hunt said she informed board members that the petition had 223 certified signatures.
Collins followed the proper procedure, Hunt said.
In Massachusetts, the proper procedure requires the petition to be returned to the clerk's office for certification of signatures so that the clerk can certify that the signers are Dalton residents and registered voters.
The petition has to be submitted to the clerk's office because they have the state computers which allow them to certify a citizens petition, she said.
"I was surprised. I mean, those are pretty basic things, so I was a little shocked when I saw it this morning that those two, what I would have guessed to be clear to everybody wasn't, but I think they're clear on it now," Hunt said.
In a follow-up, Collins expressed his disappointment with the board's decision, describing it as a "travesty" and the " impediment to democracy" he has seen in the town in a long time.
"What is it that that Select Board is trying to hide that they don't want anybody else new in their sandbox," Collins said.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more