image description

Health, Environmental Officials: Pittsfield GE Landfills Don't Pose Risk

Staff ReportsiBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Residents continue to express concerns about PCB exposure from the former General Electric campus but health and environmental experts say there is no risk.

Last week, the council subcommittee on public health and safety received an annual update from the Environmental Protection Agency, state Department of Environmental Protection, and the state Department of Public Health on the capped landfills on Hill 78 and Building 71 that abut Allendale School.

"In summary, for the OPCAs, GE is conducting the long-term monitoring and maintenance program as required by the consent decree in GE's final report program overseen by federal EPA and Mass DEP with support from Mass DPH, and only routine maintenance and minor cap repairs have been required," said Richard Fisher, remedial project manager for the EPA Region 1.

"And the data shows there is no health threat posed to Allendale school or abutting neighborhood by vapors from contaminated groundwater, and that PCB concentrations in the ambient air have been well below the conservative from risk-based levels."

At the beginning of the meeting, Dan Avenue resident Valerie Anderson, who is also a member of the EPA GE Citizens Coordinating Council, said, "Many citizens are rightfully concerned about cancer rates in Pittsfield and the surrounding towns."

"On my small street of only 11 houses, six households have experienced cancer while living there, over 50 percent of the people on my little street," she said.

"My father worked at GE for 41 years in the factory area that recently has undergone demolition. He had cancer and my mother had cancer."

Foot Avenue resident Kaitlyn Pierce, a longtime advocate for transparency and action on PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) contamination, said the community deserves risk evaluations that reflect current science such as indoor air quality and healthcare support.

"What are the specific measures being taken to ensure that local health care providers are equipped with the knowledge and resources to identify and manage PCB exposure effectively?" she asked.

"Without informed medical professionals, our community remains vulnerable and without proper treatment plans for chronic and serious illnesses."

Allendale was remediated in 1999, and some additional work was done in 2007 and 2008. GE placed remediation materials into the Hill 78 and Building 71 on-plant consolidation areas in the early 2000s, and both were closed and capped by 2009.

A long-term inspection, monitoring, and maintenance plan was included in GE's 2011 OPCA Final Completion Report. GE monitors the OPCAs' physical integrity and groundwater while sampling the air for PCBs and the EPA does air sampling for Allendale twice a year.

Groundwater monitoring is done twice a year on 12 wells surrounding the OPCAs with four additional downgrading wells to test for volatile organic compounds as needed. There are three monitoring wells between Allendale and the OPCAs and for the last 48 months, all were non-detect for PCE, TCE, and PCBs.

Groundwater is said to float away from the school.

"And actually, just before this meeting, I looked further back regarding PCBs just because the subject has been raised about the PCBs and the ground groundwater as related to the school," Fisher said.


"And in the, I think it was like 24 years of monitoring, there's never been a (GW-2 performance standard) exceedance for PCBs."

He said that, in summary, all OPCA monitoring wells continue to show no incremental risk to occupants of existing buildings via indoor air or surface water.

GE conducts air sampling on five locations on its property twice per year and the EPA conducts sampling at two locations on the Allendale property, which will continue until it is agreed to be unnecessary.

The 2021-2024 PCB air levels are 55 to 500 times below the risk-based action level set for the project and consistent with the EPA's latest toxicity information.

Fisher showed a chart that illustrated the air levels falling significantly below the "conservative" notification and action level since 2005, adding "Especially following the Building 71 closure, I mean, it's very very very low."

Ward 2 Councilor Brittany Noto emphasized the importance of indoor residential testingRegional Director Michael Gorski explained that DEP doesn't typically perform indoor air monitoring due to jurisdictional issues with entering people's homes.

"I think that there are a lot of things in buildings, even outside of Pittsfield, out of the areas with PCB concerns, they have PCBs in them," he said.

"So I think indoor air is something that should be considered at all times."

During the meeting, a 2022 study on PCBs in air and human blood in Pittsfield was referenced. The study, conducted by members of the University at Albany's Institute for Health and the Environment in New York, says:

"Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and three chlorinated pesticides were determined in serum from 21 residents of Pittsfield, MA and in the basement, living room and outdoor air of the 10 homes in which they lived. Median serum PCB levels were 4.2 ng/g, which are at least four times the average level in the US population, and consisted primarily of more highly chlorinated, persistent congeners. This reflects contamination with PCBs coming from the local General Electric facility."

Dean Tagliaferro, EPA project manager, argued that the 2022 report did not have recent data and said he confirmed this with one of the contributors. Noto argued that the determinations, outcomes, and findings of the study are current.

Jessica Burkhamer of the MassDPH reported that they are looking at ways to address concerns about healthcare providers' education on PCB exposure.

The DPH's Bureau of Climate and Environmental Health is using data from the Massachusetts cancer registry to evaluate 10 selected cancer types in the communities of Pittsfield, Lenox League, Stockbridge, and Great Barrington over a 25-year period from 1995 through 2019. The data analysis has been completed and a final report is expected this winter.

"This has been going on for a long time so I'm wondering why this material is just being developed because this has been going on here for decades so our clinicians, our providers, should have materials," Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said, later asking why the cancer study has taken more than five years to complete.

It was explained that the cancer registry only recently released the data but it was made available to DPH early for the study.


Tags: contamination,   PCBs,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories