Pittsfield Tax Rates Down But Values Mean Increased Bills

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The city's tax rates have gone down but rising property values will increase most bills.  

On Tuesday, the City Council approved a residential tax rate of $17.94 per $1,000 of valuation and a commercial, industrial, and personal property tax rate of $37.96 per $1,000 of valuation.

The fiscal year 2025 rate is 51 cents lower than the previous year but the average tax bill for a single-family home valued at $295,291 will increase by $354.51 annually. Last year, the same home was worth $267,914.

Of the 11,328 single-family homes, 568 will see a decrease, 1,687 will see an increase of less than $100, and 3,777 will see an increase less than the average.

"As you can see, most of our assessed values are up," Chief Assessor Laura Catalano said.

While a couple of councilors expressed concerns, the motion passed unanimously.

"As I said before, this is always the worst meeting for me," Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said.

At the beginning of the term in January, she submitted a petition asking for a budget that is as close to level-funded as possible. She said the city collaboratively worked hard to get close to that goal and going forward, they should do the same.

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren said the new administration has been responsive to ideas and concerns in developing this metric.

"Politics, I have found, is a give and take situation and since I don't think I can take some of the things that [Mayor Peter Marchetti's] done for us and not give so this year, I will be supporting this tax rate but I concur with Councilor Amuso that we have to still focus, really focus," he said.


"Because I'm going to tell you next year, it's going to be worse, I think, on a national level. I think we're going to be seeing federal funds dry up. I think the economy is not going to be as good so we're going to find ourselves behind an eight ball that we may not have seen for years."

The levy limit for FY25 is $114,615,097 and $1,872,514 in new growth is expected.  With a levy limit of 114,615,097, the city has $294,085.80 in excess levy capacity, more than $531,000 less than the year prior.

The city hit its levy ceiling in fiscal year 2016 through 2021.

Finance Director Matthew Kerwood said that even when the levy ceiling was met in prior years, there was an excess levy capacity. He finds this a "bit concerning."

"Given the constraints, we really did need to budget in a different way, more conservatively, just given the constraints that we were under so we were able to create that excess level capacity," he said.

"But this is again, the lowest it has been in, since I've been here."

Kerwood said one of the fundamental things that needs to be considered in the next budget session is generating new growth.

"It's really new growth that plays a key factor in being able to expand that levy," he said.

Earlier in the meeting, the council supported a second two-year extension of a tax increment financing agreement with Somnath LLC, initially approved in 2021. The Desai family, who are well established in the local sector, plan to build a Holiday Inn Express at 1055 South St.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip said the $13 million hotel is a perfect example of new growth.


Tags: fiscal 2025,   property taxes,   tax classification,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories