image description
Town officials are still discussing options for Dalton Division Road.

Dalton to Talk Roundabout, Designs for Dalton Division Road

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board will discuss at it's meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 12, whether to reconsider its preferred option for the preliminary designs of Dalton Division Road. 
 
During a meeting last December, the Select Board voted to advocate for Concept A, which would have sidewalks on both sides, a 5-foot bike lane in the road on both sides with a buffer, and a 2-foot painted buffer between the vehicle lane and in the bike lane. They also recommended the two-way stop control option. 
 
This would be the most expensive and "certainly not" the engineer or the state's "preferred design," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
The town's engineers are scheduled to speak at the next board meeting. 
 
The town's engineers are ready for the next step of the project, which will be starting to finalize the plan that the town approves for the state, he said. 
 
Hutcheson said he reviewed this with Chair Robert Bishop and Vice Chair Dan Esko, and there were some sentiments to revisit the decision that was made previously. 
 
Esko said that he supports the roundabout and the most affordable "path of least resistance to get this project done" in a timely fashion. 
 
"At the end of the day, getting a sidewalk on that whole road is a win. "It doesn't really matter what side it's on, to be honest with you," Esko said, with Bishop agreeing to this sentiment. 
 
Board members Marc Strout, former member Joe Diver, and Esko voted to advocate for Concept A at last year's meeting. 
 
They raised concerns about the preliminary designs' value for town residents, specifically noting that the Dalton side would not receive sidewalks despite paying for the associated project costs.
 
The project has challenges surrounding wetlands, state Department of Transportation requirements, and easements. 
 
The project would examine redesigns of the intersection off Williams Street, Washington Mountain Road, and Mountain Road to improve safety.
 
The two intersection options were a roundabout and a two-way stop control. The roundabout would require a permanent fee. 
 
Steve Savaria, Fuss & O'Neil project manager and senior traffic engineer, said during the December meeting that the existing roadway already crosses private property, so it would need to be corrected regardless. 
 
However, there would be about 6,000 square feet of the lot on the corner where Shire Donuts is located.  
 
Some of the construction of the intersection will take place over the line onto Williams Street so MassDOT does view this project as being in both municipalities, Savaria said during the December meeting. 
 
Last December, Diver motioned to advocate for the two-way stop control option because it is a new scope because of state requirements. 
 
If MassDOT chooses the roundabout option, the town could also be responsible for the "land grab." 
 
Boyle and Diver agreed that Pittsfield should pay at least half the cost of the project because it would benefit the city just as much as Dalton, if not more, if there were only sidewalks on the Pittsfield side.
 
"It works fine now. Make some minor corrections to it, and move forward because I would not support more funds to take over land when we don't even know what our next capital plan is for the next one or two years," Diver said in December. 
 
Bishop was absent during the December meeting, and Boyle was against the motion to advocate for he two-way stop control option because he favored the roundabout design.
 
Savaria said during the December meeting that the two-way stop control option would have little impact on traffic operations.
 
"You would still have the same issues with the geometry of the intersection being contrary to people's normal expectation of the right away, and that's the problem that you have there now. That the main flow is going around the corner instead of going straight in any direction," he said. 
 
During the Monday night meeting, Boyle expressed his strong disagreement with the decision made in December to advocate for the two-way stop control option. 
 
He noted that the chairman at the time, Diver, did not seek input from the police chief, fire chief, Department of Public Works director, or officials from neighboring towns before making the motion.
 
Following the December meeting, the Traffic Commission weighed in on the topic, and some felt the roundabout was "a better alternative." More information here
 
At the December meeting, Diver originally motioned to pause the project to inform the Metropolitan Planning Organization that the board had "major concerns." 
 
Boyle agreed with this motion, but it was later voted down due to worries of delaying the project. 

Tags: road project,   roundabout,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories