image description

Question 2: Is MCAS a Tool or Barrier?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Those who oppose the removal of MCAS as a graduation requirement fear it will stunt accountability while supporters feel it bogs students down. 
 
Voters will decide Tuesday if students must pass the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System test to earn a high school diploma. The competency test has been in the schools for more than 30 years, a result of the state's 1993 Education Reform Act.
 
A "yes" vote would remove the 10th grade MCAS (or any assessment test) as a graduation requirement; a "no" vote will keep it in place. The ballot initiative would not remove the testing, just the requirement for graduation. 
 
iBerkshires.com has gathered stances from local and statewide stakeholders on the contentious ballot initiative.
 
Both a former and current governor have come out against Question 2. Former Gov. Jane Swift helped write the Education Reform Act as a state senator and strongly supported its implementation as governor.  
 
Gov. Maura Healey has attributed the public school system's high performance to high standards. She regards the MCAS as an important benchmark for measuring performance. 
 
During an Oct. 23 visit to North County, Secretary of Education Patrick Tutwiler said the ballot question reflects an event: education reform. 
 
"Change in education should really happen through a process," he said. "When it doesn't happen through a process, there are usually consequences, and in this case, we can say there's some pretty predictable consequences." 
 
The secretary said he and Healey adamantly oppose removing the MCAS as a graduation requirement and are even concerned that it could make schools inequitable. 
 
"First, we think that assessment is important. It gives us a statewide view into how students are doing across Grades 3 through 8 and then again in high school so that we can develop a coherent strategy to address meeting the needs of students who aren't performing to expectation," Tutwiler explained. 
 
"We also believe in a uniform standard for graduation. If the ballot question passes, we'll have up to 350 different definitions for what a high school diploma means, and we feel like that opens up some serious equity questions. Right? A diploma from Lawrence, Mass., should mean the same as a diploma from Newton, Mass., and if the ballot question passes, we won't be able to say that that's the case with confidence." 
 
Those in favor of removing the MCAS requirement feel it will reduce barriers to student success — which include socioeconomic factors. 
 
Hoosac Valley Regional School Committee Vice Chair Erin Milne said she has seen firsthand the amount of resources and stress that goes into making sure everyone passes the MCAS to graduate. 
 
"I think yes on 2 would go a long way towards allowing school staff to focus on the kinds of education like we heard about today that is product-based," she said a recent School Committee. 
 
"Applied learning is actually going to help them get jobs, as opposed to checking off this one box. It doesn't eliminate the MCAS, so it can still get all that kind of level data, and the data will help us move forward, but it will limit a whole lot of stress for a whole lot of students."
 
She feels the requirement has become a barrier to success that disproportionately affects students of color, low-income students, English language learners, and students with disabilities. 
 
"Some say that this is a non-issue because most students who initially fail the MCAS eventually pass through retakes or appeals. But marginalized students struggle with retakes more than their peers, creating unfair obstacles to graduation and increasing drop-out rates," she wrote in a letter to the editor
 
"To be clear, these students are not less capable: they are being failed by a system that isn't meeting their needs. The MCAS provides useful data to hold systems accountable for rigorous, fair learning outcomes in Grades 3-8 without making students bear the consequences of our failure to serve them equitably; why can't the same apply to sophomores?" 
 
In September, the Executive Committee of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees unanimously approved a statement in support of Question 2: 
 
"MASC does not support the use of a high stakes test as a requirement for a graduation diploma. We urge voters to vote 'yes' on Question 2. We urge the Legislature to act expeditiously to rethink the entire MCAS system to create a more equitable and reasonable set of competency standards for a high school diploma."
 
Similarly, the Massachusetts Teachers Association passed a resolution in support of removing the MCAS requirement, coining the test as "significantly limited in its ability to accurately and effectively measure whether students are meeting the Commonwealth's standards and developing the skills they need to thrive after high school." 
 
On the other hand, opposers of the question believe it may spark equity concerns.   
 
North Adams Superintendent of Schools Barbara Malkas said she remembers what it was like before standards and accountability. 
 
"The disparate education provided to students with different levels of expectations meant that some students received an inequitable and subpar education in most cases dependent on demographic," she explained. 
 
"While MCAS as an assessment does not represent the competencies for college and career readiness as a whole, in the absence of this accountability measure for districts, schools, and students, districts would still be held accountable to meeting targets and students would have no motivation to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to the best of their ability." 
 
She would "happily" support a more comprehensive review of the MCAS assessment system with the opportunity for high school students to demonstrate competency through authentic applications of their learning. 
 
"But that is not what this ballot question proposes. It does not eliminate the MCAS, only the competency determination for high school students."
 
Malkas noted that she supports the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents' position. 
 
The MASS Executive Committee recently voted to oppose Question 2, believing it would undermine the high standards that are the "cornerstone of Massachusetts' successful work in education reform over the past 30 years." 
 
"In voting to oppose Question 2, members of the MASS Executive Committee stated that their primary objection to the measure is that it fails to stipulate a replacement for MCAS as a statewide standard for earning a high school diploma," the committee wrote in a letter to state leaders. 
 
"If Question 2 were to pass, there would be no standard by which every student in Massachusetts demonstrates their readiness to graduate from a public high school." 
 
However, MASS asserts that Grade 10 MCAS exams alone are insufficient as the statewide standard for high school graduation. In the last legislative session, it unsuccessfully proposed a bill to explore alternatives for assessing student learning and holding districts accountable for success. 
 
"While conceding the need to maintain MCAS as a graduation requirement rather than no standard at all, we are writing to insist once again that education and political leaders at the State level take seriously the repeated calls from our organization and many others to launch an inclusive process for developing and adopting alternative measures," the executive committee wrote.
 
"If Question 2 is defeated, as many of you have indicated you believe it should be, we simply cannot settle for the status quo moving forward."
 
The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee has debated the issue but not taken a stance other than to request that MASC remove language in its resolution for "moratorium" on testing. MASC holds its annual convention on Wednesday. 
 
Actor and Cambridge resident Matt Damon weighed in on Question 2, in a video shared by the Massachusetts Teachers Association.
 
"We need to trust our teachers not some one-size-fits-all test," Damon says. "Teachers use multiple forms of assessment to determine whether or not a student deserves a diploma or not. So let's put the power back in their hands to make that decision."
 
The Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants supports a "No" vote so that the statewide education system can "uphold a culture of excellence and accountability." 
 
The group alleges that repealing this requirement would force every public school in the commonwealth to create its own standardized graduation requirements. 
 
"This would lead to a patchwork of standards across the state, resulting in disparities in educational quality and standards. If educational standards are lowered in high school, students may graduate without developing the analytical, mathematical, and problem-solving skills critical for success in fields like accounting," MassCPAs wrote in a statement on Question 2. 
 
"This could result in a pipeline of future accountants who are less prepared for the rigorous demands of the profession. Additionally, creating new requirements, rather than the statewide MCAS tests, places an undue burden on local school districts, many of which may lack the resources and expertise to develop and implement effective assessments." 
 
Additionally, MassCPAs feel that the MCAS creates a consistent benchmark for public schools and their students as well as an equalizer to help mitigate disparities in grading practices and varied curriculums. 
 
"As educators, employers, and community leaders, we are unwavering in our commitment to maintaining rigorous academic standards that are vital to the success of our students and the future of our industry. Voting no on Question 2 is essential to preserving these standards and ensuring that students are fully prepared for careers that demand specialized knowledge, like accounting." 
 
The Mass Opportunity Alliance showed its support for MCAS testing with a public education initiative to how statewide standardized testing helps make students "wicked smart."  
 
MOA, a coalition of parties committed to building a stronger commonwealth economy, polled more than 500 registered voters on the question and found "strong public support for standardized testing, especially among parents and racial minorities." 
 
The study showed 62 percent of residents in favor of standardized testing such as the MCAS, 70 percent of parents in support, and 80 percent of high school students. 

Tags: election 2024,   MCAS,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories