image description

Pittsfield Council, School Committee Want Better Communication

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council and School Committee would like next year's budget process to go better than the last.

Both bodies met jointly on Monday at Reid Middle School with the intent to bridge the disconnect between school staff, the administration, and public officials during the budget process.

"It's important that the people in the school department understand how the budget works," Councilor at Large Earl Persip III said.

The city's operating budget for fiscal year 2025 passed with a $200,000 reduction to the $82 million Pittsfield Public School budget. During the final approval, all conversation was related to the schools, as droves of staff members came to council chambers believing this was a direct slash to positions.

The cut was aimed at the Mercer Administration Building or non-personnel line items. It was agreed that misinformation sparked the controversy and was attributed to a "divide" between the school district and the council.

Mayor Peter Marchetti said as the city begins the next budget, the doors of communication have to "really, really be open."

"Because if anybody thought fiscal year 2025 was a bumpy road in how we got to where we're getting, buckle up," he cautioned.

"Because I'm going to sound the alarm now that fiscal year 2026 is going to be 100 times harder."

After presentations from Marchetti, Superintendent Joseph Curtis and Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke, Persip wanted to hear more about the school staff's involvement.

He suggested a formal process for staff members to submit feedback on the budget.

"I noticed when you were talking, the principals are heavily involved. What is the staff's involvement? Like with the principals to present their budget? Is there something I'm missing that's just not in this presentation?" he asked.

Curtis said it is unique to each school.

"Typically, the school principal has had conversation with the staff about the budget implications or what they are seeing as a viable recommendation to us," he explained.

"We hear from staff members via email. Sometimes it's a petition, all different types of ways. Sometimes it's direct contact with the School Committee that they then bring forward so it happens in a variety of different ways."

The superintendent also provides staff updates early in the budget process.

"Often, as well, they feel more comfortable with communicating with their union and so we have monthly meetings with our union presidents and often they'll communicate about positions that they've heard from their staff," he added.

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said she had more phone calls, emails, and in-person interactions than she would have expected about the school budget "and have to take those seriously when you have teachers and paras and recently retired administrators saying, 'We think there's room for reductions in the school budget.'"

The former School Committee chair agrees that non-administrators should have more involvement.


"It's important that we do fund the schools appropriately because we want all our children to succeed at every level," she said.

"And we want to be able to support a budget that comes before us that we know that your school system at all levels, employees support and I think that's a little bit for me, what happened last year."

School Committee Chair William Cameron said "It's not that there is any exclusion of these employees from participating in the process" but people are coming to the wrong body with concerns. He feels this is worth further discussion.

"If people are coming to the City Council with, I'll say call them complaints, but suggestions about ways that economies could be made, they're coming in at the wrong level," he said.

"Because the City Council votes only on an appropriation, and the School Committee has the capacity to take money from one line and either eliminate it or reallocate it elsewhere."

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi feels this is a step in the right direction for ensuring more productive conversation moving forward. She is concerned about the multiple requests for anonymity when staff members voiced concerns.

"Something that was not mentioned is along with how many pieces of communications I think we all received on the City Council from employees of the School Department was a request for anonymity in those emails and phone calls and text messages and community conversations," she said.

"And to me, as somebody who has worked in HR and in hiring, that speaks to the culture and it's difficult. It's difficult to improve the culture of any organization. There are a variety of reasons why it's difficult but there's a culture of people feeling as though they cannot speak up about their concerns without being retaliated against and I don't think that we are doing the conversation service without truly acknowledging that."

School Committee member Sara Hathaway is concerned about the district's morale in general and in some cases, she said it comes back to funding. In the late budget process, she noticed that people didn't understand that the end of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds was separate from the budget problems.

Several ESSER-funded positions expired for the fiscal year but were separate from budget cuts.

Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre observed that employees do not feel that they have the agency to come forward with their feelings or don't have the opportunity to participate in a constructive way.

"An email blast out to all staff is not really going to create a feeling of welcomeness," she said.

President Pete White suggested consulting the Human Resources Department for ways to solicit feedback from city employees — possibly a suggestion box.

"I think in any environment, you don't always feel comfortable speaking up because I do know a fair share of non-school employees who have expressed concerns to me over different things," he said.

"So I don't think it's something unique just to the school department but maybe because we're coming together, we could come up with a solution for employees of the city as a whole to have a better way to express some of their views."

Persip recognized that it is difficult for staff members to stay informed by coming to meetings, as they have families and commitments.  He didn't see them coming up with an answer that night but wants more consideration on how to better provide information and feedback opportunities.

He pointed to Cameron's claim that school staff don't know the process and that's what the bodies should focus on.

"They will feel more invested," Persip said. "It comes back to culture. Working on a culture. We have a culture problem."


Tags: fiscal 2026,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories