DALTON, Mass. — Voters can expect a special election to fill the vacant Select Board seat left open when Joe Diver stepped down.
A citizen petition with 237 signatures from residents calling for a special election was handed in on Wednesday afternoon. Town Clerk Heather Hunt said the town clerk's office is now in the process of certifying the signatures.
Since then, he worked with Thomas Irwin and several other supporting town members to gather signatures.
While gathering signatures, Collins said residents were confused as to why the board didn't want to fill the seat, especially considering the vacant spot on the five-member board is what would break a tie.
"... None of the people collecting signatures, nobody declined not to sign. Everybody that was asked about the petition and told about the petition happily signed, and we're on board for having a special election."
During its meeting on Tuesday, the board discussed how to fill the vacant seat. Members had to decide whether to hold a special election or wait until the annual town election in May.
Diver's three-year term concludes this May so the winner of the special election would complete the half-year left.
The board voted to take no action on the matter and to revisit it in November once they see legal counsel and gather more information on legal, financial, and logistical aspects of a special election before deciding how to proceed.
Select Board expressed concerns about having a special election due to the cost, it not requiring mail-in voting, proximity to holiday and winter weather that could lower voter turnout, and the additional strain on the town clerk's office because of how close it would be to the presidential election in November.
"And I don't see the reasoning to spend that kind of money for a two, or probably about a three to three and a half months appointment when the person will have to turn right around and get re-elected again," Select Board Chair Robert Bishop said.
Hunt said that although mail-in ballots are not required for a special election, the board makes that decision.
If the board decided to include mail-in ballots, especially considering older folks who don't go out in the winter, it would increase the cost of the special election.
Board members at the meeting knew that a petition had been taken out, and Hunt informed them that if it reached 200 signatures, the decision on how to fill the vacant seat was no longer the board's; the special election would have to happen.
Member John Boyle pointed out that Massachusetts law states that a Select Board can only delay a special election if it is close to the annual town election.
According to MGL (Chapter 41 Section 10), the request for a special election must be submitted at least 100 days before the next annual election.
This does not include the presidential election; rather, it refers to the annual elections, which Dalton holds in May.
During the discussion on the petition, Bishop questioned whether those who agreed to sign knew that the board had yet to make a decision.
The petition does not say anything about the cost or other matters surrounding a special election, Bishop said.
Board members agreed they would rather wait until the presidential election is over before calling a special election.
The town clerk's office would have 64 days to set up the special election if they did that. In addition, there are specific deadlines for obtaining nomination papers, 51 days prior, submitting signatures, 49 days prior, and publishing the warrant, 14 days prior.
If the board were to hold a special election after the presidential election the earliest election that could happen would be the beginning of January, Vice Chair Dan Esko said.
"Beginning of January, let's say we had an election, the next election is [about] five months away. In any case, my point being, as a board, I don't know that it makes sense for us to even call one, considering the timing and the cost. I don't now. If the special elections called by citizens, so be it. We'll have to just take care of that," Esko said.
Board members said many people are misinformed about the situation. Boyle said there are legalities surrounding whether to hold a special election, some of which will require answers from the town's legal counsel.
"I would say, these people that are circulating this petition, I don't know who they are, I've heard the rumors, too. Right now, we're only acting on rumors," Boyle said.
"That is not only irresponsible, it is expensive for the town of Dalton to be doing this."
Bishop asked whether petitioners who signed the petition and later changed their minds would be allowed to remove their names from the petition.
At the meeting, Hunt said she had never been asked a question like that before and was unsure of the answer.
In a follow-up, Hunt said the town has not heard from any signers expressing an interest in removing their names from the petition.
If that changes and a number of signers express an interest in removing their names from the petition, they will spend more time researching whether that is an option, she said.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more