Dalton Board to Discuss Remaining ARPA Funds

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The town will be deciding how it wants to use its remainder of the American Rescue Plan Act funds before the Dec. 31 deadline. 
 
The town received $1,950,367.06 in ARPA funds between 2021 and 2022. Since then, it has allocated funds for several projects, equipment, studies, and more. This includes funds for COVID-19 tests, a fiber ring upgrade, paving, heat pumps, and more.
 
During a Select Board meeting on Sept. 23, funding for various items was approved, including a shed for the Fitch Hoose House museum, replacing windows and doors at the town garage, a sewer pump generator, replacing rented dumpsters, office furniture and equipment replacements, and a feasibility study for a proposed public safety facility.
 
Following those allocations, Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said there is about $3,000 remaining. 
 
Former Select Board member Joe Diver recommended that the remainder be used for an employee appreciation holiday party. 
 
Although approved at the Sept. 23 meeting, the board rescinded that amount on Tuesday at the recommendation of Town Accountant Sandra Albano. 
 
"Unfortunately, despite the much-appreciated attention of the board, having a holiday party for employees is not within the bounds of what public money can pay for it," Hutcheson said. 
 
During the September meeting, Boyle expressed his opposition to using the funds for a party and questioned why they could not be allocated to the Orchard Road project. 
 
Diver explained at the September meeting that the reconstruction of Orchard Road is funded through a $1 million MassWorks grant. The project is expected to take place in 2025. More information here
 
It was previously reported that the reconstruction funded by the grant did not include sidewalks due to insufficient funding. 
 
Community members have expressed a need for sidewalks on the connector road to Route 9. 
 
Because of the community's interest, the board agreed, during a previous meeting, to consider that addition. The project is now going out to bid in December with sidewalks included, said Highway Superintendent Edward "Bud" Hall in a follow-up. 
 
"If there is a shortage of funds, we will address it at that time more than likely with Chapter 90 funds to subsidize the project," he said. 
 
With the $3,000 rescinded, the town must decide how best to use the remaining funds before the fast-approaching deadline. 
 
Hutcheson stated that he does not yet have a specific project which to allocate the remaining funds. 
 
He recommended that the board wait on a decision until he has a clearer understanding of how much remains in case projects that have already been allocated ARPA funding come in under budget.
 
"I hope to get all that spending done as quickly as possible. It's not always easy, but I am reminding people who have authorizations to spend them as quickly as possible so that we can lose as little as possible in case things come in under budget at the very end," he said. 
 
The board will discuss how to use the remaining funds at a future meeting. 

Tags: ARPA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories