image description
Residents' demands for recycling toters have been outpacing supply. The toter system will be fully implemented effective Nov. 12.

Pittsfielders Want Extra Recycling Toters, Not Trash Toters

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— About a month into the new trash system, more than 2,200 extra recycling toters and over 500 additional trash toters have been requested.  

Mayor Peter Marchetti is most excited about these metrics and hopes the trend stays. This is a 4-to-1 request for 48-gallon recycling and trash toters.

"I'm going to try to remain optimistic that they're asking for the additional recycles because they recognize the information that we're putting out there," he told the City Council on Tuesday.

"If you recycle, you won't need as much trash. My sense is if you're calling and asking for a second recyclable toter and you know what the size is, you'd be making your decisions about trash."

The delivery of recycling toters began on Sept. 10 and trash toters will begin rolling out on Oct. 14.  Marchetti explained that the last trash collection will happen on Nov. 11 and from there, the toter system will be fully implemented.

Officials say Pittsfield's nearly 17,400 households produce about 1,800 pounds of trash each annually, generating close to 20 tons as a community. The system aims to reduce each household's waste to 1,370 pounds annually.

Households can have an additional recycling toter for free and a second for trash if they pay an extra $40 quarterly.

The administration reached constituents through nine community meetings, mailers, print and digital media, radio, public access, and social media so they were informed about the new system.

There were 17,000 impressions through location-based ad targeting, 8,900 video plays on Facebook, 900 YouTube impressions with a nearly 67 percent view rate, 60,000 print ad subscribers, and 38,000 listeners of radio ads.

A Facebook reminder on Sept. 13 reached more than 29,200 people.

"The communication has been great," Councilor at Large Earl Persip III said.

"Anybody that says they haven't been communicated to is just not paying attention. Let's be honest, there's been so much communication out there."

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa also commended the outreach.

"I know I was one of the people who was like, 'We need more communication' and you delivered and that shows," she said.


"There was a lot of questions at the beginning and your office and Casella and the commissioner's office has been great at responding and helping me solve questions and problems from constituents so I really appreciate that. I really appreciate the Spanish language work as well."

Hiccups were expected during this process and the administration vowed to maintain transparency with constituents. Marchetti explained that Casella Waste Systems needed more time to deliver toters and the window was expanded. But many residents were not aware that they could use the toters right away and reminders were issued on CodeRED and social media, and there were addresses with more or less units than the city thought.

"We found the quick first mistake that we had and that was that Casella believed that they could deliver 3,500 totes in less than 48 hours and we found in that first week that that wasn't happening," Marchetti said.

The last issue sparked conversation, as there were concerns that apartment buildings with more than four units would be grandfathered into the new system by mistake.

"We had the issue where multiple units over four had trash or recycling pickup and the residents who rent those spaces weren't aware that they no longer had trash or recycling pickup because it's something that was against our code but we were also doing for the last, 2006 it was changed, so we've been doing it since then and now they're putting the trash on the side of the road," Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey said, asking how the city is communicating with those landlords to make sure that get a dumpster and handle trash on their own.

Marchetti admitted that the city missed the mark on targeted communication with landlords about two weeks ago. Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales reported that they are working with the health department to contact landlords via email.  

"The city took the approach of every single household that we pick up trash got a postcard. The city have been promoting six ways to Sunday about the toter system. I had an individual in my office very concerned that she was going to get evicted from her property because she asked for a second recycling tote," he said.

"The light bulb in my mind went on that we have been communicating wide and far that this is happening but we did not reach out to the landlords to have a conversation with them because we were working on a property-by-property basis."

While tenants requesting an additional recycling toter makes no impact, the cost of an additional trash toter would need to be paid by the tenant or landlord.

Persip has heard horror stories about Casella delivering to apartment buildings and asked why the light bulb hasn't gone off that buildings with over four units don't receive municipal trash and recycling.

Marchetti attributed this to occasional errors in the list being provided to the trash company and outsourced work for the deliveries.

"I agree with you. It shouldn't be happening for whatever reason. Some we have communicated this already," Morales said.

"The good thing about all this, it won't happen for the trash delivery because we have been cleaning the list but at the same time, I will say that 19,600 deliveries and 127 have been delivered wrong."

There were 127 requests to remove recycling toters after they were over-delivered, which could also be attributed to second homes and people no longer living there.


Tags: recycling,   toters,   trash,   waste collections,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories